SWRD.L vs. ESIE.L
SWRD.L (SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF) and ESIE.L (iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - SWRD.L is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index, while ESIE.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SWRD.L returned 11.98%/yr vs 18.59%/yr for ESIE.L. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SWRD.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for ESIE.L.
Performance
SWRD.L vs. ESIE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SWRD.L is traded in USD, while ESIE.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ESIE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWRD.L achieves a 9.88% return, which is significantly lower than ESIE.L's 33.89% return.
SWRD.L
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 4.05%
- YTD
- 9.88%
- 6M
- 11.00%
- 1Y
- 26.07%
- 3Y*
- 20.92%
- 5Y*
- 11.98%
- 10Y*
- —
ESIE.L
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- -3.14%
- YTD
- 33.89%
- 6M
- 31.13%
- 1Y
- 57.84%
- 3Y*
- 20.85%
- 5Y*
- 18.59%
- 10Y*
- —
SWRD.L vs. ESIE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWRD.L SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF | 9.88% | 21.09% | 19.26% | 24.41% | -17.81% | 22.11% | 5.63% |
ESIE.L iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 33.89% | 29.20% | -11.21% | 11.63% | 29.52% | 25.51% | 4.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWRD.L and ESIE.L is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2020 | 0.32 |
The correlation between SWRD.L and ESIE.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SWRD.L vs. ESIE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SWRD.L
ESIE.L
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
SWRD.L
ESIE.L
-
Financial Services
SWRD.L
ESIE.L
-
Industrials
SWRD.L
ESIE.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
SWRD.L
ESIE.L
-
Communication Services
SWRD.L
ESIE.L
Healthcare
SWRD.L
ESIE.L
-
Consumer Defensive
SWRD.L
ESIE.L
-
Energy
SWRD.L
ESIE.L
Basic Materials
SWRD.L
ESIE.L
-
Utilities
SWRD.L
ESIE.L
-
Real Estate
SWRD.L
ESIE.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWRD.L vs. ESIE.L — Risk / Return Rank
SWRD.L
ESIE.L
SWRD.L vs. ESIE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWRD.L | ESIE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.42 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.12 | 5.65 | -2.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.22 | 18.59 | -5.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWRD.L | ESIE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.20 | 2.53 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.72 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.81 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
SWRD.L vs. ESIE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWRD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.10%, which is greater than ESIE.L's maximum drawdown of -25.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWRD.L and ESIE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWRD.L | ESIE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.10% | -25.00% | -9.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.31% | -10.18% | +1.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.89% | -25.00% | +8.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.54% | -25.00% | -0.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -5.54% | +5.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.02% | -7.12% | +2.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 3.10% | -1.13% |
Volatility
SWRD.L vs. ESIE.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L) is 3.33%, while iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIE.L) has a volatility of 8.02%. This indicates that SWRD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESIE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWRD.L | ESIE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.33% | 8.02% | -4.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.04% | 19.20% | -10.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.81% | 22.81% | -11.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.52% | 25.95% | -10.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 26.16% | -8.90% |
SWRD.L vs. ESIE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWRD.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ESIE.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SWRD.L vs. ESIE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SWRD.L nor ESIE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SWRD.L and ESIE.L have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SWRD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for ESIE.L.
SWRD.L is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ESIE.L is Energy Equities. SWRD.L tracks MSCI World Index, while ESIE.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SWRD.L and 0.18% for ESIE.L.
Find the right allocation for SWRD.L and ESIE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer