SWRD.L vs. ACWI.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SWRD.L (SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF) and ACWI.L (SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SWRD.L is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index, while ACWI.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SWRD.L returned 11.98%/yr vs 11.34%/yr for ACWI.L. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SWRD.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for ACWI.L.

Performance

SWRD.L vs. ACWI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L) and SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (ACWI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SWRD.L is traded in USD, while ACWI.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ACWI.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWRD.L achieves a 9.88% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI.L's 11.55% return.

SWRD.L

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 4.05%
• YTD: 9.88%
• 6M: 11.00%
• 1Y: 26.07%
• 3Y*: 20.92%
• 5Y*: 11.98%
• 10Y*: —

ACWI.L

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 4.40%
• YTD: 11.55%
• 6M: 13.16%
• 1Y: 29.03%
• 3Y*: 21.18%
• 5Y*: 11.34%
• 10Y*: 12.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWRD.L vs. ACWI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SWRD.L SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF	9.88%	21.09%	19.26%	24.41%	-17.81%	22.11%	15.89%	14.63%
ACWI.L SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF	11.55%	22.95%	17.67%	21.68%	-18.36%	19.19%	15.32%	14.37%

Correlation

The correlation between SWRD.L and ACWI.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2019	0.92

The correlation between SWRD.L and ACWI.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

SWRD.L vs. ACWI.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SWRD.L	ACWI.L
Technology	28.3%	29.2%
Financial Services	15.7%	16.5%
Industrials	11.4%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	9.3%
Communication Services	9.2%	9.0%
Healthcare	8.8%	8.0%
Consumer Defensive	5.2%	4.9%
Energy	4.2%	4.3%
Basic Materials	3.3%	3.6%
Utilities	2.7%	2.7%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.7%

Return for Risk

SWRD.L vs. ACWI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWRD.L

SWRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 69
SWRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
SWRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
SWRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 67
SWRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
SWRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 72

ACWI.L

ACWI.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
ACWI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
ACWI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
ACWI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
ACWI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
ACWI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWRD.L vs. ACWI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L) and SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (ACWI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SWRD.L	ACWI.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	2.44	-0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.27	3.56	-0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.44	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.12	3.18	-0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.22	13.81	-0.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SWRD.L vs. ACWI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWRD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the ACWI.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWRD.L and ACWI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SWRD.L	ACWI.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.20	2.44	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	0.74	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.81	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	0.66	+0.17

Drawdowns

SWRD.L vs. ACWI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWRD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.10%, roughly equal to the maximum ACWI.L drawdown of -33.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWRD.L and ACWI.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SWRD.L	ACWI.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.10%	-33.59%	-0.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.31%	-9.09%	+0.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.89%	-17.16%	+0.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.54%	-26.90%	+1.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.49%	-0.72%	+0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.02%	-4.91%	-0.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	2.10%	-0.13%

Volatility

SWRD.L vs. ACWI.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L) and SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (ACWI.L) have volatilities of 3.33% and 3.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SWRD.L	ACWI.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.33%	3.36%	-0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.04%	9.21%	-0.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.81%	11.86%	-0.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.52%	15.24%	+0.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.26%	15.66%	+1.60%

SWRD.L vs. ACWI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWRD.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI.L's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

SWRD.L vs. ACWI.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SWRD.L nor ACWI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SWRD.L and ACWI.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, SWRD.L and ACWI.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, SWRD.L or ACWI.L?

On fees, SWRD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SWRD.L or ACWI.L?

SWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ACWI.L.

What is the main difference between SWRD.L and ACWI.L?

SWRD.L is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ACWI.L is Global Equities. SWRD.L tracks MSCI World Index, while ACWI.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SWRD.L and 0.40% for ACWI.L.