SWQRX vs. FSNLX
SWQRX (Schwab Target 2065 Fund) and FSNLX (Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund Class K) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, SWQRX returned 9.59%/yr vs 4.33%/yr for FSNLX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SWQRX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for FSNLX.
Performance
SWQRX vs. FSNLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWQRX achieves a 12.10% return, which is significantly higher than FSNLX's 5.87% return.
SWQRX
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 4.30%
- YTD
- 12.10%
- 6M
- 13.35%
- 1Y
- 28.51%
- 3Y*
- 19.54%
- 5Y*
- 9.59%
- 10Y*
- —
FSNLX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 1.67%
- YTD
- 5.87%
- 6M
- 6.64%
- 1Y
- 14.67%
- 3Y*
- 10.42%
- 5Y*
- 4.33%
- 10Y*
- —
SWQRX vs. FSNLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWQRX Schwab Target 2065 Fund | 12.10% | 20.95% | 14.36% | 21.21% | -20.23% | 15.97% |
FSNLX Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund Class K | 5.87% | 13.23% | 6.29% | 11.43% | -14.53% | 6.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWQRX and FSNLX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2021 | 0.86 |
The correlation between SWQRX and FSNLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWQRX vs. FSNLX — Risk / Return Rank
SWQRX
FSNLX
SWQRX vs. FSNLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2065 Fund (SWQRX) and Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund Class K (FSNLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWQRX | FSNLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.38 | 2.52 | -0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.29 | 3.68 | -0.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.51 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 3.25 | -0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.24 | 14.36 | -1.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWQRX | FSNLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.38 | 2.52 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.57 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.77 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
SWQRX vs. FSNLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWQRX drawdown since its inception was -28.26%, which is greater than FSNLX's maximum drawdown of -20.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWQRX and FSNLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWQRX | FSNLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.26% | -20.41% | -7.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.80% | -4.70% | -5.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.02% | -6.76% | -9.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.26% | -20.41% | -7.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.67% | -4.06% | -2.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 1.06% | +1.14% |
Volatility
SWQRX vs. FSNLX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Target 2065 Fund (SWQRX) has a higher volatility of 3.63% compared to Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund Class K (FSNLX) at 2.20%. This indicates that SWQRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSNLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWQRX | FSNLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 2.20% | +1.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.79% | 4.95% | +4.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.38% | 5.92% | +6.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.94% | 7.61% | +8.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.80% | 7.88% | +7.92% |
SWQRX vs. FSNLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWQRX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FSNLX's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
SWQRX vs. FSNLX - Dividend Comparison
SWQRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, less than FSNLX's 6.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSNLX Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund Class K | 6.46% | 6.50% | 4.02% | 2.74% | 8.44% | 10.79% | 6.72% | 6.77% | 8.21% | 2.16% |
SWQRX Schwab Target 2065 Fund | 2.82% | 3.16% | 2.92% | 3.31% | 5.00% | 2.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, SWQRX and FSNLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SWQRX has higher volatility (3.63%) compared to FSNLX (2.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWQRX dropped -28.26% vs FSNLX's -20.41%.
FSNLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SWQRX and FSNLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer