PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSNLX vs. SSBWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSNLX vs. SSBWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund Class K (FSNLX) and State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund (SSBWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSNLX achieves a 4.94% return, which is significantly lower than SSBWX's 6.74% return.


FSNLX

1D
0.89%
1M
-0.80%
6M
3.15%
YTD
4.94%
1Y
10.64%
3Y*
9.23%
5Y*
3.99%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.84%

SSBWX

1D
1.15%
1M
-0.47%
6M
4.49%
YTD
6.74%
1Y
14.56%
3Y*
11.95%
5Y*
5.86%
10Y*
8.55%
ALL TIME*
7.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FSNLX vs. SSBWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSNLX
Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund Class K
4.94%13.23%6.29%11.43%-14.53%7.36%12.32%16.37%-4.36%3.37%
SSBWX
State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund
6.74%15.92%9.76%15.66%-17.17%10.75%17.27%22.52%-6.23%4.64%

Correlation

The correlation between FSNLX and SSBWX is 0.95, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2017

0.94

The correlation between FSNLX and SSBWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSNLX vs. SSBWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSNLX
FSNLX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FSNLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSNLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSNLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FSNLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSNLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

SSBWX
SSBWX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SSBWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSBWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSBWX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SSBWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSBWX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSNLX vs. SSBWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund Class K (FSNLX) and State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund (SSBWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSNLXSSBWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.32

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

2.20

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.20

9.33

-0.13

FSNLX vs. SSBWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSNLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the SSBWX Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSNLX and SSBWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSNLX vs. SSBWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSNLX drawdown since its inception was -20.41%, smaller than the maximum SSBWX drawdown of -23.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSNLX and SSBWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSNLXSSBWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.41%

-23.73%

+3.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.70%

-6.20%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.70%

-9.73%

+4.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.41%

-23.73%

+3.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

-1.13%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

-4.12%

+0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.14%

1.46%

-0.32%

Volatility

FSNLX vs. SSBWX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund Class K (FSNLX) is 2.04%, while State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund (SSBWX) has a volatility of 2.21%. This indicates that FSNLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSBWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSNLXSSBWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.04%

2.21%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.78%

6.74%

-0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.65%

8.09%

-1.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.72%

10.73%

-3.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.89%

11.28%

-3.39%

FSNLX vs. SSBWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSNLX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than SSBWX's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSNLX vs. SSBWX - Dividend Comparison

FSNLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.52%, which matches SSBWX's 6.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSNLX
Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund Class K
6.52%6.50%4.02%2.74%8.44%10.79%6.72%6.77%8.21%2.16%0.00%0.00%
SSBWX
State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund
6.47%6.91%6.16%4.11%5.78%6.18%4.92%6.65%5.24%0.46%1.75%2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FSNLX and SSBWX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SSBWX has higher volatility (2.21%) compared to FSNLX (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSNLX dropped -20.41% vs SSBWX's -23.73%.

SSBWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSNLX and SSBWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer