SWP vs. CMDT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SWP (SWP Growth & Income ETF) and CMDT (PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - SWP is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by SWP Investment Management, while CMDT is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. SWP is actively managed, while CMDT is passively managed. Over the past year, SWP returned 19.64% vs 21.34% for CMDT. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. SWP charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CMDT.

Performance

SWP vs. CMDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SWP Growth & Income ETF (SWP) and PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWP achieves a 5.13% return, which is significantly lower than CMDT's 13.43% return.

SWP

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -0.96%
• YTD: 5.13%
• 6M: 4.51%
• 1Y: 19.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CMDT

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: -8.86%
• YTD: 13.43%
• 6M: 13.42%
• 1Y: 21.34%
• 3Y*: 12.77%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWP vs. CMDT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SWP SWP Growth & Income ETF	5.13%	16.86%	0.95%
CMDT PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund	13.43%	12.78%	0.40%

Correlation

The correlation between SWP and CMDT is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024	-0.01

Return for Risk

SWP vs. CMDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWP

SWP Risk / Return Rank: 51
SWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
SWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
SWP Omega Ratio Rank: 51
SWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
SWP Martin Ratio Rank: 54

CMDT

CMDT Risk / Return Rank: 50
CMDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
CMDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
CMDT Omega Ratio Rank: 48
CMDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
CMDT Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWP vs. CMDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SWP Growth & Income ETF (SWP) and PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SWP	CMDT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	1.71	-0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.32	2.39	-0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.29	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.98	1.93	+0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.67	9.62	-0.95

SWP vs. CMDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWP Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the CMDT Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWP and CMDT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SWP vs. CMDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWP drawdown since its inception was -16.41%, which is greater than CMDT's maximum drawdown of -11.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWP and CMDT.

Drawdown Indicators

	SWP	CMDT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.41%	-11.11%	-5.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.97%	-11.11%	+1.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.47%	-11.11%	+8.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.39%	-2.77%	+0.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.27%	2.25%	+0.02%

Volatility

SWP vs. CMDT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SWP Growth & Income ETF (SWP) is 3.05%, while PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that SWP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SWP	CMDT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.05%	3.26%	-0.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.57%	10.60%	-1.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.10%	12.65%	-0.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.44%	12.24%	+2.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.44%	12.24%	+2.20%

SWP vs. CMDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CMDT's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

SWP vs. CMDT - Dividend Comparison

SWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.95%, more than CMDT's 2.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CMDT PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund	2.67%	3.04%	8.80%	2.71%
SWP SWP Growth & Income ETF	6.95%	5.64%	0.44%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SWP and CMDT in my portfolio?

SWP and CMDT have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SWP or CMDT?

CMDT has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to SWP (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWP dropped -16.41% vs CMDT's -11.11%.

Which ETF is better, SWP or CMDT?

On 1-year performance, CMDT leads with 21.34% vs 19.64% for SWP. On fees, CMDT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, SWP has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SWP or CMDT?

Over the 1-year period, CMDT has performed better with a 21.34% return vs 19.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SWP or CMDT?

CMDT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for SWP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SWP or CMDT?

SWP has the higher dividend yield at 6.95%, compared with 2.67% for CMDT.

What is the main difference between SWP and CMDT?

SWP is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while CMDT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: SWP Investment Management and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for SWP and 0.65% for CMDT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CMDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.