PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWMCX vs. SFNNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWMCX vs. SFNNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund (SWMCX) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity Index Fund (SFNNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWMCX achieves a 14.87% return, which is significantly lower than SFNNX's 17.57% return.


SWMCX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.41%
6M
10.49%
YTD
14.87%
1Y
19.57%
3Y*
16.12%
5Y*
8.23%
10Y*

SFNNX

1D
0.55%
1M
-1.27%
6M
13.80%
YTD
17.57%
1Y
36.03%
3Y*
22.54%
5Y*
13.40%
10Y*
11.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWMCX vs. SFNNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWMCX
Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund
14.87%10.54%15.28%17.20%-17.31%22.55%17.03%30.46%-9.16%0.40%
SFNNX
Schwab Fundamental International Equity Index Fund
17.57%41.06%2.27%19.88%-7.95%14.38%4.35%18.09%-13.96%0.85%

Correlation

The correlation between SWMCX and SFNNX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2017

0.76

The correlation between SWMCX and SFNNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWMCX vs. SFNNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWMCX
SWMCX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
SWMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
SWMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

SFNNX
SFNNX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SFNNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFNNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFNNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SFNNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFNNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWMCX vs. SFNNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund (SWMCX) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity Index Fund (SFNNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWMCXSFNNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.41

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

3.33

-1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.75

11.69

-2.95

SWMCX vs. SFNNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWMCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the SFNNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWMCX and SFNNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWMCX vs. SFNNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWMCX drawdown since its inception was -40.34%, smaller than the maximum SFNNX drawdown of -59.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWMCX and SFNNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWMCXSFNNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.34%

-59.60%

+19.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.15%

-10.63%

+2.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.07%

-13.78%

-7.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.09%

-25.66%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-3.26%

+2.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.56%

-11.92%

+5.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

3.03%

-0.89%

Volatility

SWMCX vs. SFNNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund (SWMCX) is 4.28%, while Schwab Fundamental International Equity Index Fund (SFNNX) has a volatility of 5.86%. This indicates that SWMCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SFNNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWMCXSFNNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.28%

5.86%

-1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.40%

13.30%

-2.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.85%

15.55%

-1.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.31%

15.74%

+2.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.57%

17.04%

+3.53%

SWMCX vs. SFNNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWMCX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SFNNX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SWMCX vs. SFNNX - Dividend Comparison

SWMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, less than SFNNX's 4.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SFNNX
Schwab Fundamental International Equity Index Fund
4.35%5.11%3.61%3.26%2.92%3.81%2.42%3.69%3.51%2.70%3.21%2.92%
SWMCX
Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund
1.85%2.13%2.60%1.49%1.59%2.93%1.45%2.44%1.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SWMCX and SFNNX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SFNNX has higher volatility (5.86%) compared to SWMCX (4.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWMCX dropped -40.34% vs SFNNX's -59.60%.

SFNNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWMCX and SFNNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer