SWMCX vs. DNLDX
SWMCX (Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund) and DNLDX (BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, SWMCX returned 8.43%/yr vs 10.82%/yr for DNLDX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SWMCX charges 0.04%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for DNLDX.
Performance
SWMCX vs. DNLDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SWMCX having a 13.97% return and DNLDX slightly lower at 13.68%.
SWMCX
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 3.34%
- YTD
- 13.97%
- 6M
- 12.48%
- 1Y
- 22.52%
- 3Y*
- 17.51%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- —
DNLDX
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 3.99%
- YTD
- 13.68%
- 6M
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 22.83%
- 3Y*
- 19.40%
- 5Y*
- 10.82%
- 10Y*
- 10.65%
SWMCX vs. DNLDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWMCX Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund | 13.97% | 10.54% | 15.28% | 17.20% | -17.31% | 22.55% | 17.03% | 30.46% | -9.16% | 0.40% |
DNLDX BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund | 13.68% | 9.79% | 22.27% | 16.99% | -14.34% | 26.49% | 9.29% | 16.82% | -14.46% | -0.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWMCX and DNLDX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2017 | 0.98 |
The correlation between SWMCX and DNLDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWMCX vs. DNLDX — Risk / Return Rank
SWMCX
DNLDX
SWMCX vs. DNLDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund (SWMCX) and BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SWMCX | DNLDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.31 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 3.30 | -0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.06 | 12.34 | -1.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SWMCX vs. DNLDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWMCX drawdown since its inception was -40.34%, smaller than the maximum DNLDX drawdown of -63.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWMCX and DNLDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWMCX | DNLDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.34% | -63.69% | +23.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.15% | -7.29% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.07% | -20.42% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.09% | -23.42% | -2.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | 0.00% | -0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.60% | -9.62% | +3.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 1.95% | +0.18% |
Volatility
SWMCX vs. DNLDX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund (SWMCX) and BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) have volatilities of 4.42% and 4.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWMCX | DNLDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.42% | 4.43% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.48% | 10.15% | +0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.85% | 13.54% | +0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.31% | 18.54% | -0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.62% | 19.55% | +1.07% |
SWMCX vs. DNLDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWMCX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than DNLDX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
SWMCX vs. DNLDX - Dividend Comparison
SWMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than DNLDX's 13.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNLDX BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund | 13.22% | 14.15% | 15.24% | 1.69% | 8.82% | 17.74% | 2.77% | 2.65% | 11.14% | 11.32% | 1.00% | 3.12% |
SWMCX Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund | 1.87% | 2.13% | 2.60% | 1.49% | 1.59% | 2.93% | 1.45% | 2.44% | 1.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, SWMCX and DNLDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DNLDX has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to SWMCX (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWMCX dropped -40.34% vs DNLDX's -63.69%.
DNLDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SWMCX and DNLDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer