SWLVX vs. FLCOX
SWLVX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value Index Fund) and FLCOX (Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 Value Index, from Charles Schwab and Fidelity respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SWLVX returned 11.69%/yr vs 11.70%/yr for FLCOX. Their 0.99 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. Both charge a 0.04% expense ratio.
Performance
SWLVX vs. FLCOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with SWLVX at 20.05% and FLCOX at 20.05%.
SWLVX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 14.82%
- YTD
- 20.05%
- 1Y
- 32.19%
- 3Y*
- 17.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.69%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.94%
FLCOX
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- 6M
- 14.83%
- YTD
- 20.05%
- 1Y
- 32.24%
- 3Y*
- 17.69%
- 5Y*
- 11.70%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.99%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
SWLVX vs. FLCOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWLVX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value Index Fund | 20.05% | 15.87% | 14.36% | 11.45% | -7.61% | 25.15% | 2.64% | 26.49% | -8.39% | 0.30% |
FLCOX Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund | 20.05% | 15.90% | 14.38% | 11.48% | -7.57% | 25.09% | 2.87% | 26.54% | -8.38% | -1.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWLVX and FLCOX is 1.00 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2017 | 0.99 |
The correlation between SWLVX and FLCOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWLVX vs. FLCOX — Risk / Return Rank
SWLVX
FLCOX
SWLVX vs. FLCOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value Index Fund (SWLVX) and Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SWLVX | FLCOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.46 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.33 | 4.35 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.59 | 18.62 | -0.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SWLVX vs. FLCOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWLVX drawdown since its inception was -38.34%, roughly equal to the maximum FLCOX drawdown of -38.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWLVX and FLCOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWLVX | FLCOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.34% | -38.28% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.82% | -6.80% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.61% | -15.60% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.05% | -19.00% | -0.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.56% | -0.56% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.76% | -4.39% | -0.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.60% | 1.60% | 0.00% |
Volatility
SWLVX vs. FLCOX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value Index Fund (SWLVX) and Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX) have volatilities of 2.94% and 2.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWLVX | FLCOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.94% | 2.92% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.77% | 8.72% | +0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.42% | 11.43% | -0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.86% | 14.84% | +0.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 17.56% | +0.90% |
SWLVX vs. FLCOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SWLVX and FLCOX have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SWLVX vs. FLCOX - Dividend Comparison
SWLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than FLCOX's 0.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCOX Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund | 0.87% | 1.51% | 1.92% | 1.99% | 2.01% | 1.55% | 2.28% | 3.82% | 2.79% | 0.60% |
SWLVX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value Index Fund | 1.68% | 2.02% | 2.75% | 2.56% | 2.29% | 4.86% | 2.00% | 4.35% | 1.87% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, SWLVX and FLCOX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SWLVX has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to FLCOX (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWLVX dropped -38.34% vs FLCOX's -38.28%.
FLCOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SWLVX and FLCOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer