PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWLD.L vs. SBUY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWLD.L vs. SBUY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWLD.L) and Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SWLD.L is traded in GBP, while SBUY.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SBUY.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWLD.L achieves a 9.96% return, which is significantly higher than SBUY.L's 5.54% return.


SWLD.L

1D
-0.28%
1M
5.24%
YTD
9.96%
6M
10.41%
1Y
27.28%
3Y*
17.98%
5Y*
13.15%
10Y*

SBUY.L

1D
-0.25%
1M
0.82%
YTD
5.54%
6M
7.84%
1Y
24.13%
3Y*
18.42%
5Y*
10.77%
10Y*
13.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWLD.L vs. SBUY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SWLD.L
SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF
9.96%12.85%21.19%17.70%-8.06%23.66%12.00%14.48%
SBUY.L
Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF
5.54%21.60%14.64%9.46%-0.90%21.36%8.43%14.82%

Correlation

The correlation between SWLD.L and SBUY.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2019

0.83

The correlation between SWLD.L and SBUY.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SWLD.L vs. SBUY.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SWLD.L
SBUY.L

Technology

28.3%
7.6%

Financial Services

15.7%
32.9%

Industrials

11.4%
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
15.8%

Communication Services

9.2%
4.1%

Healthcare

8.8%
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
1.9%

Energy

4.2%
17.1%

Basic Materials

3.3%
1.4%

Utilities

2.7%
2.2%

Real Estate

1.9%
0.5%

Technology

SWLD.L
28.3%
SBUY.L
7.6%

Financial Services

SWLD.L
15.7%
SBUY.L
32.9%

Industrials

SWLD.L
11.4%
SBUY.L
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SWLD.L
9.3%
SBUY.L
15.8%

Communication Services

SWLD.L
9.2%
SBUY.L
4.1%

Healthcare

SWLD.L
8.8%
SBUY.L
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

SWLD.L
5.2%
SBUY.L
1.9%

Energy

SWLD.L
4.2%
SBUY.L
17.1%

Basic Materials

SWLD.L
3.3%
SBUY.L
1.4%

Utilities

SWLD.L
2.7%
SBUY.L
2.2%

Real Estate

SWLD.L
1.9%
SBUY.L
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWLD.L vs. SBUY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWLD.L
SWLD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SWLD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWLD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWLD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SWLD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWLD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

SBUY.L
SBUY.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SBUY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBUY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBUY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
SBUY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBUY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWLD.L vs. SBUY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWLD.L) and Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SWLD.LSBUY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.44

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.13

5.02

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.62

16.17

+0.45

SWLD.L vs. SBUY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWLD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is comparable to the SBUY.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWLD.L and SBUY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SWLD.LSBUY.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70

2.46

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

0.79

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.84

+0.08

Drawdowns

SWLD.L vs. SBUY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWLD.L drawdown since its inception was -25.85%, smaller than the maximum SBUY.L drawdown of -30.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWLD.L and SBUY.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWLD.LSBUY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.85%

-30.91%

+5.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

-4.79%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.65%

-17.76%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.65%

-17.76%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-0.38%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.17%

-3.99%

+0.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

1.49%

+0.15%

Volatility

SWLD.L vs. SBUY.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWLD.L) has a higher volatility of 2.52% compared to Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L) at 2.16%. This indicates that SWLD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBUY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWLD.LSBUY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.52%

2.16%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.23%

6.99%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.11%

9.83%

+0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.21%

13.73%

-0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.26%

15.51%

-0.25%

SWLD.L vs. SBUY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWLD.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than SBUY.L's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

SWLD.L vs. SBUY.L - Dividend Comparison

SWLD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SBUY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SBUY.L
Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF
1.70%1.86%1.80%1.73%1.91%1.20%1.62%1.90%1.31%1.22%1.60%1.27%
SWLD.L
SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SWLD.L and SBUY.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SWLD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SWLD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SBUY.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SWLD.L and 0.39% for SBUY.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWLD.L and SBUY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer