PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWLD.L vs. MIST.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWLD.L vs. MIST.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in State Street SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWLD.L) and PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF Institutional GBP (Hedged) Accumulation (MIST.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWLD.L achieves a 9.92% return, which is significantly higher than MIST.L's 2.23% return.


SWLD.L

1D
-0.63%
1M
-0.25%
6M
8.72%
YTD
9.92%
1Y
21.18%
3Y*
17.88%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*

MIST.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.32%
6M
2.06%
YTD
2.23%
1Y
4.37%
3Y*
5.04%
5Y*
3.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWLD.L vs. MIST.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SWLD.L
State Street SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF
9.92%12.84%21.21%17.69%-8.06%23.66%12.00%1.66%
MIST.L
PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF Institutional GBP (Hedged) Accumulation
2.23%4.61%5.53%5.01%-1.12%-0.36%0.63%0.28%

Correlation

The correlation between SWLD.L and MIST.L is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2019

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWLD.L vs. MIST.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWLD.L
SWLD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SWLD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWLD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWLD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SWLD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWLD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

MIST.L
MIST.L Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
MIST.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIST.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIST.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
MIST.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIST.L Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWLD.L vs. MIST.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWLD.L) and PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF Institutional GBP (Hedged) Accumulation (MIST.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWLD.LMIST.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-9.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-32.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

7.17

-5.79

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

101.64

-98.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.56

493.90

-481.34

SWLD.L vs. MIST.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWLD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is lower than the MIST.L Sharpe Ratio of 11.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWLD.L and MIST.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWLD.L vs. MIST.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWLD.L drawdown since its inception was -32.06%, which is greater than MIST.L's maximum drawdown of -3.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWLD.L and MIST.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWLD.LMIST.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.06%

-3.70%

-28.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.56%

-0.04%

-6.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.94%

-0.20%

-19.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.94%

-2.45%

-17.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

0.00%

-1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.94%

-0.38%

-6.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

0.01%

+1.67%

Volatility

SWLD.L vs. MIST.L - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWLD.L) has a higher volatility of 2.59% compared to PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF Institutional GBP (Hedged) Accumulation (MIST.L) at 0.10%. This indicates that SWLD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MIST.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWLD.LMIST.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

0.10%

+2.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.80%

0.28%

+7.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.45%

0.38%

+10.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.13%

0.58%

+18.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.95%

0.98%

+19.97%

Dividends

SWLD.L vs. MIST.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SWLD.L nor MIST.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SWLD.L and MIST.L have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SWLD.L tracks MSCI World Index, while MIST.L tracks PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF Institutional GBP (Hedged) Accumulation. They also come from different issuers: State Street and PIMCO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWLD.L and MIST.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer