PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWLD.L vs. KSTR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWLD.L vs. KSTR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in State Street SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWLD.L) and KraneShares ICBCCS SSE Star Market 50 Index UCITS ETF (KSTR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SWLD.L is traded in GBP, while KSTR.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the KSTR.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWLD.L achieves a 9.92% return, which is significantly lower than KSTR.L's 47.78% return.


SWLD.L

1D
-0.63%
1M
-0.25%
6M
8.72%
YTD
9.92%
1Y
21.18%
3Y*
17.88%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*

KSTR.L

1D
0.00%
1M
7.59%
6M
30.93%
YTD
47.78%
1Y
100.79%
3Y*
21.82%
5Y*
1.08%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWLD.L vs. KSTR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SWLD.L
State Street SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF
9.92%12.84%21.21%17.69%-8.06%14.75%
KSTR.L
KraneShares ICBCCS SSE Star Market 50 Index UCITS ETF
47.78%32.59%7.07%-22.86%-30.81%7.24%

Correlation

The correlation between SWLD.L and KSTR.L is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021

0.18

The correlation between SWLD.L and KSTR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (3 years) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWLD.L vs. KSTR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWLD.L
SWLD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SWLD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWLD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWLD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SWLD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWLD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

KSTR.L
KSTR.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
KSTR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KSTR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
KSTR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
KSTR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
KSTR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWLD.L vs. KSTR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWLD.L) and KraneShares ICBCCS SSE Star Market 50 Index UCITS ETF (KSTR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWLD.LKSTR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.42

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

5.51

-2.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.56

13.88

-1.32

SWLD.L vs. KSTR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWLD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the KSTR.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWLD.L and KSTR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWLD.L vs. KSTR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWLD.L drawdown since its inception was -32.06%, smaller than the maximum KSTR.L drawdown of -65.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWLD.L and KSTR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWLD.LKSTR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.06%

-65.22%

+33.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.56%

-18.17%

+11.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.94%

-38.63%

+18.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.94%

-65.22%

+45.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

-16.50%

+15.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.94%

-35.63%

+28.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

7.22%

-5.54%

Volatility

SWLD.L vs. KSTR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWLD.L) is 2.59%, while KraneShares ICBCCS SSE Star Market 50 Index UCITS ETF (KSTR.L) has a volatility of 18.96%. This indicates that SWLD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KSTR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWLD.LKSTR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

18.96%

-16.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.80%

32.99%

-25.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.45%

39.98%

-29.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.13%

33.76%

-14.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.95%

33.70%

-12.75%

SWLD.L vs. KSTR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWLD.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than KSTR.L's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

SWLD.L vs. KSTR.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SWLD.L nor KSTR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SWLD.L and KSTR.L have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SWLD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SWLD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for KSTR.L.

SWLD.L tracks MSCI World Index, while KSTR.L tracks KraneShares ICBCCS SSE Star Market 50 Index UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: State Street and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SWLD.L and 0.82% for KSTR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWLD.L and KSTR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer