PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWISX vs. FSMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWISX vs. FSMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab International Index Fund (SWISX) and Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWISX achieves a 8.95% return, which is significantly lower than FSMD's 17.58% return.


SWISX

1D
3.03%
1M
2.66%
YTD
8.95%
6M
10.44%
1Y
21.50%
3Y*
16.43%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
9.70%

FSMD

1D
1.00%
1M
6.31%
YTD
17.58%
6M
15.58%
1Y
29.65%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
10.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWISX vs. FSMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SWISX
Schwab International Index Fund
8.95%31.59%3.54%18.13%-14.30%11.25%8.14%11.44%
FSMD
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
17.58%8.70%15.18%17.37%-11.15%26.40%8.94%8.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SWISX and FSMD is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2019

0.73

The correlation between SWISX and FSMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

SWISX vs. FSMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SWISX
FSMD

Financial Services

24.4%
14.8%

Industrials

20.3%
20.1%

Technology

10.7%
20.5%

Healthcare

9.2%
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

7.0%
3.1%

Basic Materials

6.1%
4.0%

Communication Services

4.6%
2.9%

Energy

4.1%
4.1%

Utilities

4.0%
2.1%

Real Estate

2.0%
6.2%

Financial Services

SWISX
24.4%
FSMD
14.8%

Industrials

SWISX
20.3%
FSMD
20.1%

Technology

SWISX
10.7%
FSMD
20.5%

Healthcare

SWISX
9.2%
FSMD
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SWISX
7.7%
FSMD
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

SWISX
7.0%
FSMD
3.1%

Basic Materials

SWISX
6.1%
FSMD
4.0%

Communication Services

SWISX
4.6%
FSMD
2.9%

Energy

SWISX
4.1%
FSMD
4.1%

Utilities

SWISX
4.0%
FSMD
2.1%

Real Estate

SWISX
2.0%
FSMD
6.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWISX vs. FSMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWISX
SWISX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
SWISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWISX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
SWISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWISX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMD
FSMD Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWISX vs. FSMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Index Fund (SWISX) and Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWISXFSMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.31

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

3.30

-1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.82

11.89

-5.07

SWISX vs. FSMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWISX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the FSMD Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWISX and FSMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWISX vs. FSMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWISX drawdown since its inception was -60.65%, which is greater than FSMD's maximum drawdown of -40.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWISX and FSMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWISXFSMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.65%

-40.67%

-19.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.39%

-8.44%

-2.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.68%

-22.16%

+8.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.42%

-22.16%

-7.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

0.00%

-1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.80%

-5.98%

-8.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

2.34%

+0.71%

Volatility

SWISX vs. FSMD - Volatility Comparison

Schwab International Index Fund (SWISX) and Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) have volatilities of 5.34% and 5.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWISXFSMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.34%

5.14%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.07%

11.85%

+1.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.74%

15.69%

+0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.39%

18.55%

-2.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.90%

21.43%

-4.53%

SWISX vs. FSMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWISX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than FSMD's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

SWISX vs. FSMD - Dividend Comparison

SWISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, more than FSMD's 1.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSMD
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
1.18%1.33%1.29%1.37%1.54%1.18%1.32%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SWISX
Schwab International Index Fund
3.26%3.55%3.29%3.31%2.73%3.34%1.88%3.09%3.15%2.71%3.19%2.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


SWISX and FSMD have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SWISX has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to FSMD (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWISX dropped -60.65% vs FSMD's -40.67%.

FSMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWISX and FSMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer