PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWISX vs. FHLFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWISX vs. FHLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab International Index Fund (SWISX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SWISX having a 11.84% return and FHLFX slightly lower at 11.78%.


SWISX

1D
-0.74%
1M
1.29%
6M
5.73%
YTD
11.84%
1Y
25.23%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
9.33%
10Y*
9.55%
ALL TIME*
5.87%

FHLFX

1D
-0.71%
1M
1.26%
6M
5.76%
YTD
11.78%
1Y
25.30%
3Y*
16.61%
5Y*
9.45%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SWISX vs. FHLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SWISX
Schwab International Index Fund
11.84%31.59%3.54%18.13%-14.30%11.25%8.14%21.87%-11.60%
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
11.78%31.96%3.67%18.16%-14.17%11.23%8.09%21.66%-10.70%

Correlation

The correlation between SWISX and FHLFX is 1.00 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.98

The correlation between SWISX and FHLFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWISX vs. FHLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SWISX
SWISX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SWISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWISX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SWISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWISX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FHLFX
FHLFX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FHLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FHLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SWISX vs. FHLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Index Fund (SWISX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWISXFHLFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.30

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

2.23

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.45

8.46

-0.02

SWISX vs. FHLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWISX Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the FHLFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWISX and FHLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWISX vs. FHLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWISX drawdown since its inception was -60.65%, which is greater than FHLFX's maximum drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWISX and FHLFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWISXFHLFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.65%

-33.58%

-27.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.39%

-11.37%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.68%

-13.62%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.42%

-29.36%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-0.71%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.73%

-6.01%

-8.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

3.00%

0.00%

Volatility

SWISX vs. FHLFX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab International Index Fund (SWISX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) have volatilities of 4.64% and 4.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWISXFHLFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.64%

4.47%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.55%

13.25%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.88%

15.52%

+0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.43%

16.11%

+0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.63%

17.62%

-0.99%

SWISX vs. FHLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWISX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLFX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SWISX vs. FHLFX - Dividend Comparison

SWISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, more than FHLFX's 3.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
3.10%3.46%2.98%2.86%2.60%2.47%1.92%1.95%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SWISX
Schwab International Index Fund
3.17%3.55%3.29%3.31%2.73%3.34%1.88%3.09%3.15%2.71%3.19%2.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, SWISX and FHLFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SWISX has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to FHLFX (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWISX dropped -60.65% vs FHLFX's -33.58%.

FHLFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWISX and FHLFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer