PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWISX vs. EAPCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWISX vs. EAPCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab International Index Fund (SWISX) and Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWISX achieves a 9.54% return, which is significantly lower than EAPCX's 22.29% return. Over the past 10 years, SWISX has underperformed EAPCX with an annualized return of 9.33%, while EAPCX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.84% annualized return.


SWISX

1D
0.35%
1M
4.10%
YTD
9.54%
6M
11.96%
1Y
22.29%
3Y*
17.02%
5Y*
8.74%
10Y*
9.33%

EAPCX

1D
0.50%
1M
-1.11%
YTD
22.29%
6M
24.53%
1Y
41.38%
3Y*
18.36%
5Y*
14.60%
10Y*
10.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWISX vs. EAPCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWISX
Schwab International Index Fund
9.54%31.59%3.54%18.13%-14.30%11.25%8.14%21.87%-13.38%25.32%
EAPCX
Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A
22.29%22.06%9.63%-4.87%17.26%29.92%7.77%9.19%-9.60%6.71%

Correlation

The correlation between SWISX and EAPCX is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2012

0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between SWISX and EAPCX has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWISX vs. EAPCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWISX
SWISX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
SWISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWISX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
SWISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWISX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

EAPCX
EAPCX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
EAPCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAPCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAPCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
EAPCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAPCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWISX vs. EAPCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Index Fund (SWISX) and Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SWISXEAPCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.54

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

5.85

-3.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.06

20.87

-13.81

SWISX vs. EAPCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWISX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the EAPCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWISX and EAPCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SWISXEAPCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

3.06

-1.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

1.00

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.82

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.31

0.00

Drawdowns

SWISX vs. EAPCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWISX drawdown since its inception was -60.65%, which is greater than EAPCX's maximum drawdown of -52.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWISX and EAPCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWISXEAPCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.65%

-52.59%

-8.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.39%

-7.22%

-4.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.68%

-10.57%

-3.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.42%

-18.05%

-11.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.83%

-28.81%

-5.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-3.96%

+3.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.81%

-22.77%

+7.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

2.02%

+1.01%

Volatility

SWISX vs. EAPCX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab International Index Fund (SWISX) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX) at 4.17%. This indicates that SWISX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAPCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWISXEAPCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.69%

4.17%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.35%

11.59%

+0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.18%

13.90%

+1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.28%

14.64%

+1.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.88%

13.26%

+3.62%

SWISX vs. EAPCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWISX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than EAPCX's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

SWISX vs. EAPCX - Dividend Comparison

SWISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, less than EAPCX's 10.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EAPCX
Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A
10.82%13.23%5.46%3.43%14.80%13.74%3.01%1.11%0.41%4.98%6.49%0.00%
SWISX
Schwab International Index Fund
3.24%3.55%3.29%3.31%2.73%3.34%1.88%3.09%3.15%2.71%3.19%2.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


SWISX and EAPCX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SWISX has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to EAPCX (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWISX dropped -60.65% vs EAPCX's -52.59%.

EAPCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWISX and EAPCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer