PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWIM vs. CDLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SWIM vs. CDLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM) and Cardlytics, Inc. (CDLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWIM achieves a -15.59% return, which is significantly higher than CDLX's -67.48% return.


SWIM

1D
-0.37%
1M
-12.70%
6M
-14.79%
YTD
-15.59%
1Y
-20.24%
3Y*
10.99%
5Y*
-27.78%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-25.17%

CDLX

1D
-1.58%
1M
-16.33%
6M
-61.38%
YTD
-67.48%
1Y
-80.11%
3Y*
-67.86%
5Y*
-68.77%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-33.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$164.48K$203.32K$431.30K
$3.12M$3.66M$4.46M

SWIM vs. CDLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SWIM
Latham Group, Inc.
-15.59%-8.76%164.64%-18.32%-87.14%1.34%
CDLX
Cardlytics, Inc.
-67.48%-69.00%-59.72%59.34%-91.25%-46.93%

Correlation

The correlation between SWIM and CDLX is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2021

0.33

The correlation between SWIM and CDLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SWIM:

$629.33M

CDLX:

$21.72M

EPS

SWIM:

$0.07

CDLX:

-$1.76

PS Ratio

SWIM:

1.14

CDLX:

0.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

SWIM:

$551.81M

CDLX:

$205.69M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SWIM:

$157.42M

CDLX:

$79.92M

EBITDA (TTM)

SWIM:

$72.40M

CDLX:

-$74.62M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Latham Group, Inc.

Cardlytics, Inc.

Often compared with SWIM:
SWIM vs. PLSWIM vs. LUMN
Often compared with CDLX:
CDLX vs. VOOCDLX vs. GOOG

Return for Risk

SWIM vs. CDLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SWIM
SWIM Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
SWIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWIM Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
SWIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWIM Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

CDLX
CDLX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
CDLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDLX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
CDLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SWIM vs. CDLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM) and Cardlytics, Inc. (CDLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWIMCDLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

0.89

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.50

-0.94

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.91

-1.32

+0.41

SWIM vs. CDLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWIM Sharpe Ratio is -0.44, which is comparable to the CDLX Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWIM and CDLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWIM vs. CDLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWIM drawdown since its inception was -93.55%, smaller than the maximum CDLX drawdown of -99.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWIM and CDLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWIMCDLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.55%

-99.77%

+6.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.30%

-87.16%

+44.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.58%

-98.21%

+45.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.00%

-99.63%

+7.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-83.61%

-99.76%

+16.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.65%

-61.80%

-12.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.14%

62.18%

-39.04%

Volatility

SWIM vs. CDLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM) is 14.33%, while Cardlytics, Inc. (CDLX) has a volatility of 16.33%. This indicates that SWIM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CDLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWIMCDLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.33%

16.33%

-2.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.23%

62.84%

-26.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.29%

143.48%

-96.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

78.72%

132.07%

-53.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

77.43%

114.12%

-36.69%

Dividends

SWIM vs. CDLX - Dividend Comparison

Neither SWIM nor CDLX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

SWIM vs. CDLX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Latham Group, Inc. and Cardlytics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

SWIM vs. CDLX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Latham Group, Inc. and Cardlytics, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

SWIM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Latham Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 37.16M and revenue of 117.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.7%.

CDLX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cardlytics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 34.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

SWIM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Latham Group, Inc. reported an operating income of -6.60M and revenue of 117.32M, resulting in an operating margin of -5.6%.

CDLX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cardlytics, Inc. reported an operating income of -13.80M and revenue of 34.32M, resulting in an operating margin of -40.2%.

SWIM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Latham Group, Inc. reported a net income of -8.53M and revenue of 117.32M, resulting in a net margin of -7.3%.

CDLX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cardlytics, Inc. reported a net income of -4.48M and revenue of 34.32M, resulting in a net margin of -13.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SWIM and CDLX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CDLX has higher volatility (16.33%) compared to SWIM (14.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWIM dropped -93.55% vs CDLX's -99.77%.

SWIM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.44 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWIM and CDLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer