SWIM vs. PL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM) and Planet Labs PBC (PL).

Performance

SWIM vs. PL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM) and Planet Labs PBC (PL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SWIM vs. PL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SWIM Latham Group, Inc.	-15.43%	-8.76%	164.64%	-18.32%	-87.14%	-9.31%
PL Planet Labs PBC	41.73%	388.12%	63.56%	-43.22%	-29.27%	-37.88%

Fundamentals

Market Cap SWIM : $626.74M PL : $8.87B
EPS SWIM : $0.09 PL : -$0.80
PS Ratio SWIM : 1.17 PL : 27.95
PB Ratio SWIM : 1.54 PL : 47.08
Total Revenue (TTM) SWIM : $545.91M PL : $307.73M
Gross Profit (TTM) SWIM : $182.09M PL : $172.49M
EBITDA (TTM) SWIM : $73.50M PL : -$102.50M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWIM achieves a -15.43% return, which is significantly lower than PL's 41.73% return.

SWIM

• 1D: 3.87%
• 1M: -19.97%
• YTD: -15.43%
• 6M: -29.43%
• 1Y: -16.49%
• 3Y*: 23.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PL

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 15.78%
• YTD: 41.73%
• 6M: 115.33%
• 1Y: 726.92%
• 3Y*: 92.31%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SWIM vs. PL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWIM

SWIM Risk / Return Rank: 27
SWIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
SWIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
SWIM Omega Ratio Rank: 29
SWIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
SWIM Martin Ratio Rank: 23

PL

PL Risk / Return Rank: 99
PL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
PL Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
PL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
PL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
PL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWIM vs. PL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM) and Planet Labs PBC (PL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SWIM	PL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.30	6.89	-7.19
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.06	5.89	-5.95
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.72	-0.72
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.44	24.40	-24.84
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.01	60.27	-61.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SWIM vs. PL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWIM Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is lower than the PL Sharpe Ratio of 6.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWIM and PL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SWIM	PL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.30	6.89	-7.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.36	0.30	-0.66

Correlation

The correlation between SWIM and PL is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

SWIM vs. PL - Dividend Comparison

Neither SWIM nor PL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SWIM vs. PL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWIM drawdown since its inception was -93.55%, which is greater than PL's maximum drawdown of -85.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWIM and PL.

Drawdown Indicators

	SWIM	PL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.55%	-85.73%	-7.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.33%	-29.01%	-8.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-83.58%	-20.98%	-62.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-74.17%	-51.63%	-22.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.32%	11.74%	+4.58%

Volatility

SWIM vs. PL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM) is 19.59%, while Planet Labs PBC (PL) has a volatility of 35.16%. This indicates that SWIM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SWIM	PL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.59%	35.16%	-15.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.61%	65.74%	-32.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	56.06%	106.56%	-50.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	78.92%	78.34%	+0.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	78.92%	78.34%	+0.58%

Financials