PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SWIM vs. PL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


SWIMPL
YTD Return122.05%1.62%
1Y Return163.66%19.52%
3Y Return (Ann)-29.41%-38.00%
Sharpe Ratio1.650.22
Sortino Ratio2.900.78
Omega Ratio1.321.11
Calmar Ratio1.580.18
Martin Ratio11.370.78
Ulcer Index13.01%19.31%
Daily Std Dev89.65%68.73%
Max Drawdown-93.55%-85.73%
Current Drawdown-82.14%-78.80%

Fundamentals


SWIMPL
Market Cap$675.25M$736.62M
EPS$0.10-$0.47
Total Revenue (TTM)$512.11M$180.38M
Gross Profit (TTM)$134.04M$97.66M
EBITDA (TTM)$56.97M-$57.69M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between SWIM and PL is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

SWIM vs. PL - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, SWIM achieves a 122.05% return, which is significantly higher than PL's 1.62% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
57.79%
29.34%
SWIM
PL

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SWIM vs. PL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM) and Planet Labs PBC (PL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SWIM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SWIM, currently valued at 1.65, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.65
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SWIM, currently valued at 2.90, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.90
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SWIM, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.32
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SWIM, currently valued at 1.58, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.58
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SWIM, currently valued at 11.37, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0011.37
PL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PL, currently valued at 0.22, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.22
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PL, currently valued at 0.78, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.78
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PL, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.11
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PL, currently valued at 0.18, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.18
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PL, currently valued at 0.78, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.78

SWIM vs. PL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWIM Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the PL Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWIM and PL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.65
0.22
SWIM
PL

Dividends

SWIM vs. PL - Dividend Comparison

Neither SWIM nor PL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SWIM vs. PL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWIM drawdown since its inception was -93.55%, which is greater than PL's maximum drawdown of -85.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWIM and PL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-90.00%-85.00%-80.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-82.14%
-78.80%
SWIM
PL

Volatility

SWIM vs. PL - Volatility Comparison

Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM) has a higher volatility of 15.81% compared to Planet Labs PBC (PL) at 14.59%. This indicates that SWIM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
15.81%
14.59%
SWIM
PL

Financials

SWIM vs. PL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Latham Group, Inc. and Planet Labs PBC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items