PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWGRX vs. FFFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWGRX vs. FFFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Target 2015 Fund (SWGRX) and Fidelity Freedom Income Fund (FFFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWGRX achieves a 4.55% return, which is significantly lower than FFFAX's 4.96% return. Over the past 10 years, SWGRX has outperformed FFFAX with an annualized return of 6.12%, while FFFAX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.54% annualized return.


SWGRX

1D
0.09%
1M
2.04%
YTD
4.55%
6M
4.73%
1Y
12.96%
3Y*
10.28%
5Y*
4.67%
10Y*
6.12%

FFFAX

1D
0.26%
1M
1.73%
YTD
4.96%
6M
5.27%
1Y
11.56%
3Y*
8.09%
5Y*
3.27%
10Y*
4.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWGRX vs. FFFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWGRX
Schwab Target 2015 Fund
4.55%11.78%7.90%12.46%-14.56%7.50%11.47%15.05%-3.79%10.76%
FFFAX
Fidelity Freedom Income Fund
4.96%10.42%4.34%8.18%-11.33%3.12%8.93%10.74%-1.99%8.21%

Correlation

The correlation between SWGRX and FFFAX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2008

0.88

The correlation between SWGRX and FFFAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWGRX vs. FFFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWGRX
SWGRX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SWGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SWGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

FFFAX
FFFAX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FFFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FFFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWGRX vs. FFFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2015 Fund (SWGRX) and Fidelity Freedom Income Fund (FFFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SWGRXFFFAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.52

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

3.19

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.38

14.02

-1.64

SWGRX vs. FFFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWGRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the FFFAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWGRX and FFFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SWGRXFFFAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

2.57

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.61

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.98

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

1.05

-0.50

Drawdowns

SWGRX vs. FFFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWGRX drawdown since its inception was -34.83%, which is greater than FFFAX's maximum drawdown of -17.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWGRX and FFFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWGRXFFFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.83%

-17.96%

-16.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.70%

-3.68%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.12%

-4.91%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.46%

-15.87%

-8.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.46%

-15.87%

-8.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.79%

-1.79%

-3.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

0.83%

+0.23%

Volatility

SWGRX vs. FFFAX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Target 2015 Fund (SWGRX) and Fidelity Freedom Income Fund (FFFAX) have volatilities of 1.91% and 1.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWGRXFFFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.91%

1.86%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.56%

3.87%

+0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.68%

4.57%

+1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.38%

5.37%

+5.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.79%

4.64%

+4.15%

SWGRX vs. FFFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWGRX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FFFAX's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

SWGRX vs. FFFAX - Dividend Comparison

SWGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.48%, more than FFFAX's 2.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFFAX
Fidelity Freedom Income Fund
2.97%3.29%3.13%2.92%5.89%6.12%4.37%3.65%5.17%3.74%3.21%3.28%
SWGRX
Schwab Target 2015 Fund
8.48%8.87%8.02%6.06%6.48%6.90%4.41%5.44%5.15%5.67%5.27%7.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, SWGRX and FFFAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SWGRX has higher volatility (1.91%) compared to FFFAX (1.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWGRX dropped -34.83% vs FFFAX's -17.96%.

FFFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWGRX and FFFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer