PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWDA.L vs. XDEQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWDA.L vs. XDEQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWDA.L achieves a 10.08% return, which is significantly higher than XDEQ.L's 8.63% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SWDA.L having a 13.91% annualized return and XDEQ.L not far behind at 13.78%.


SWDA.L

1D
0.15%
1M
5.12%
YTD
10.08%
6M
10.35%
1Y
27.25%
3Y*
17.68%
5Y*
13.06%
10Y*
13.91%

XDEQ.L

1D
0.92%
1M
4.55%
YTD
8.63%
6M
9.20%
1Y
22.27%
3Y*
15.29%
5Y*
11.55%
10Y*
13.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWDA.L vs. XDEQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.08%12.64%21.11%17.59%-8.33%23.64%12.25%23.03%-3.78%11.78%
XDEQ.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C
8.63%7.52%18.91%19.22%-9.44%24.28%11.14%30.48%-5.16%12.25%

Correlation

The correlation between SWDA.L and XDEQ.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2014

0.68

Over the past year, SWDA.L and XDEQ.L have become more correlated (0.92) than their long-term average of 0.68, meaning their price movements have been converging.

SWDA.L vs. XDEQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SWDA.L
XDEQ.L

Technology

30.0%
30.4%

Financial Services

15.4%
14.7%

Industrials

10.9%
10.1%

Communication Services

9.2%
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
8.9%

Healthcare

8.7%
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
5.3%

Energy

4.2%
4.6%

Basic Materials

3.2%
3.2%

Utilities

2.5%
2.7%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.7%

Technology

SWDA.L
30.0%
XDEQ.L
30.4%

Financial Services

SWDA.L
15.4%
XDEQ.L
14.7%

Industrials

SWDA.L
10.9%
XDEQ.L
10.1%

Communication Services

SWDA.L
9.2%
XDEQ.L
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SWDA.L
9.0%
XDEQ.L
8.9%

Healthcare

SWDA.L
8.7%
XDEQ.L
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

SWDA.L
5.2%
XDEQ.L
5.3%

Energy

SWDA.L
4.2%
XDEQ.L
4.6%

Basic Materials

SWDA.L
3.2%
XDEQ.L
3.2%

Utilities

SWDA.L
2.5%
XDEQ.L
2.7%

Real Estate

SWDA.L
1.8%
XDEQ.L
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWDA.L vs. XDEQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWDA.L
SWDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

XDEQ.L
XDEQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XDEQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWDA.L vs. XDEQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SWDA.LXDEQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.43

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.14

3.21

+0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.55

13.32

+3.23

SWDA.L vs. XDEQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is comparable to the XDEQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWDA.L and XDEQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SWDA.LXDEQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

2.26

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

0.87

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

1.13

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

1.21

-0.32

Drawdowns

SWDA.L vs. XDEQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWDA.L drawdown since its inception was -25.58%, which is greater than XDEQ.L's maximum drawdown of -23.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWDA.L and XDEQ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWDA.LXDEQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.58%

-23.79%

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.55%

-6.90%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.50%

-17.96%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.50%

-17.96%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.58%

-23.79%

-1.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

0.00%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.49%

-3.78%

+0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

1.67%

-0.03%

Volatility

SWDA.L vs. XDEQ.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L) have volatilities of 2.52% and 2.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWDA.LXDEQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.52%

2.57%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.29%

7.12%

+0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.19%

9.81%

+0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.30%

13.37%

-0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.50%

16.89%

-2.39%

SWDA.L vs. XDEQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWDA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XDEQ.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SWDA.L vs. XDEQ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SWDA.L nor XDEQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, SWDA.L and XDEQ.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SWDA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SWDA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEQ.L.

SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index, while XDEQ.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SWDA.L and 0.25% for XDEQ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWDA.L and XDEQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer