SWDA.L vs. XDEQ.L
SWDA.L (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and XDEQ.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C) are both Global Equities funds - SWDA.L tracks the MSCI World Index while XDEQ.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SWDA.L returned 13.91%/yr vs 13.78%/yr for XDEQ.L. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SWDA.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDEQ.L.
Performance
SWDA.L vs. XDEQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWDA.L achieves a 10.08% return, which is significantly higher than XDEQ.L's 8.63% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SWDA.L having a 13.91% annualized return and XDEQ.L not far behind at 13.78%.
SWDA.L
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 10.08%
- 6M
- 10.35%
- 1Y
- 27.25%
- 3Y*
- 17.68%
- 5Y*
- 13.06%
- 10Y*
- 13.91%
XDEQ.L
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 4.55%
- YTD
- 8.63%
- 6M
- 9.20%
- 1Y
- 22.27%
- 3Y*
- 15.29%
- 5Y*
- 11.55%
- 10Y*
- 13.78%
SWDA.L vs. XDEQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.08% | 12.64% | 21.11% | 17.59% | -8.33% | 23.64% | 12.25% | 23.03% | -3.78% | 11.78% |
XDEQ.L Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 8.63% | 7.52% | 18.91% | 19.22% | -9.44% | 24.28% | 11.14% | 30.48% | -5.16% | 12.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWDA.L and XDEQ.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2014 | 0.68 |
Over the past year, SWDA.L and XDEQ.L have become more correlated (0.92) than their long-term average of 0.68, meaning their price movements have been converging.
SWDA.L vs. XDEQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SWDA.L
XDEQ.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
SWDA.L
XDEQ.L
Financial Services
SWDA.L
XDEQ.L
Industrials
SWDA.L
XDEQ.L
Communication Services
SWDA.L
XDEQ.L
Consumer Cyclical
SWDA.L
XDEQ.L
Healthcare
SWDA.L
XDEQ.L
Consumer Defensive
SWDA.L
XDEQ.L
Energy
SWDA.L
XDEQ.L
Basic Materials
SWDA.L
XDEQ.L
Utilities
SWDA.L
XDEQ.L
Real Estate
SWDA.L
XDEQ.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWDA.L vs. XDEQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
SWDA.L
XDEQ.L
SWDA.L vs. XDEQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWDA.L | XDEQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.43 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.14 | 3.21 | +0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.55 | 13.32 | +3.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWDA.L | XDEQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66 | 2.26 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 0.87 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 | 1.13 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 1.21 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
SWDA.L vs. XDEQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWDA.L drawdown since its inception was -25.58%, which is greater than XDEQ.L's maximum drawdown of -23.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWDA.L and XDEQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWDA.L | XDEQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.58% | -23.79% | -1.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.55% | -6.90% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.50% | -17.96% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.50% | -17.96% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.58% | -23.79% | -1.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | 0.00% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.49% | -3.78% | +0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.64% | 1.67% | -0.03% |
Volatility
SWDA.L vs. XDEQ.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L) have volatilities of 2.52% and 2.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWDA.L | XDEQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.52% | 2.57% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.29% | 7.12% | +0.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.19% | 9.81% | +0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.30% | 13.37% | -0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.50% | 16.89% | -2.39% |
SWDA.L vs. XDEQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWDA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XDEQ.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SWDA.L vs. XDEQ.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SWDA.L nor XDEQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, SWDA.L and XDEQ.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SWDA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SWDA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEQ.L.
SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index, while XDEQ.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SWDA.L and 0.25% for XDEQ.L.
Find the right allocation for SWDA.L and XDEQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer