SWDA.L vs. XBLC.L
SWDA.L (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and XBLC.L (Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - SWDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index, while XBLC.L is a European Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SWDA.L returned 12.78%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for XBLC.L. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SWDA.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XBLC.L.
Performance
SWDA.L vs. XBLC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SWDA.L is traded in GBp, while XBLC.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XBLC.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWDA.L achieves a 10.17% return, which is significantly higher than XBLC.L's 0.13% return.
SWDA.L
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 10.17%
- 6M
- 10.55%
- 1Y
- 27.05%
- 3Y*
- 17.68%
- 5Y*
- 12.78%
- 10Y*
- 14.16%
XBLC.L
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 0.13%
- 6M
- -0.45%
- 1Y
- 4.05%
- 3Y*
- 5.22%
- 5Y*
- 0.29%
- 10Y*
- —
SWDA.L vs. XBLC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.17% | 12.64% | 21.11% | 17.59% | -8.33% | 23.64% | 12.25% | 23.03% | -3.78% | 6.75% |
XBLC.L Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C | 0.13% | 8.46% | -0.38% | 5.36% | -8.81% | -6.92% | 8.32% | 0.25% | -0.55% | 1.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWDA.L and XBLC.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2017 | 0.25 |
The correlation between SWDA.L and XBLC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (5 years) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWDA.L vs. XBLC.L — Risk / Return Rank
SWDA.L
XBLC.L
SWDA.L vs. XBLC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) and Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XBLC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SWDA.L | XBLC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.15 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.11 | 1.08 | +3.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.14 | 2.67 | +13.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SWDA.L vs. XBLC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWDA.L drawdown since its inception was -41.70%, which is greater than XBLC.L's maximum drawdown of -21.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWDA.L and XBLC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWDA.L | XBLC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.70% | -21.28% | -20.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.55% | -3.75% | -2.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.50% | -3.75% | -14.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.50% | -16.74% | -1.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -5.58% | +5.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.49% | -8.81% | -0.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | 1.51% | +0.16% |
Volatility
SWDA.L vs. XBLC.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) has a higher volatility of 3.25% compared to Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XBLC.L) at 1.35%. This indicates that SWDA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBLC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWDA.L | XBLC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.25% | 1.35% | +1.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.73% | 3.66% | +4.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.52% | 4.80% | +5.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.35% | 6.24% | +7.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.59% | 6.89% | +7.70% |
SWDA.L vs. XBLC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWDA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XBLC.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SWDA.L vs. XBLC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SWDA.L nor XBLC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SWDA.L and XBLC.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XBLC.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XBLC.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SWDA.L.
SWDA.L is categorized as Global Equities, while XBLC.L is European Corporate Bonds. SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index, while XBLC.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SWDA.L and 0.12% for XBLC.L.
Find the right allocation for SWDA.L and XBLC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer