PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWDA.L vs. VGVE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWDA.L vs. VGVE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing (VGVE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SWDA.L is traded in GBp, while VGVE.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the VGVE.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWDA.L achieves a 10.08% return, which is significantly lower than VGVE.DE's 11.66% return.


SWDA.L

1D
0.15%
1M
5.12%
YTD
10.08%
6M
10.35%
1Y
27.25%
3Y*
17.68%
5Y*
13.06%
10Y*
13.91%

VGVE.DE

1D
-0.06%
1M
5.49%
YTD
11.66%
6M
12.09%
1Y
29.55%
3Y*
18.21%
5Y*
13.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWDA.L vs. VGVE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.08%12.64%21.11%17.59%-8.33%23.64%12.25%23.03%-3.78%1.99%
VGVE.DE
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing
11.66%14.44%19.47%17.52%-8.99%22.12%11.39%23.88%-4.53%2.30%

Correlation

The correlation between SWDA.L and VGVE.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017

0.93

The correlation between SWDA.L and VGVE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWDA.L vs. VGVE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWDA.L
SWDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

VGVE.DE
VGVE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VGVE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGVE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGVE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VGVE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGVE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWDA.L vs. VGVE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing (VGVE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SWDA.LVGVE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.51

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.14

4.29

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.55

17.35

-0.80

SWDA.L vs. VGVE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is comparable to the VGVE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWDA.L and VGVE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SWDA.LVGVE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

2.73

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

0.96

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.80

+0.09

Drawdowns

SWDA.L vs. VGVE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWDA.L drawdown since its inception was -25.58%, roughly equal to the maximum VGVE.DE drawdown of -26.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWDA.L and VGVE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWDA.LVGVE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.58%

-26.21%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.55%

-6.85%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.50%

-19.29%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.50%

-19.29%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-0.38%

+0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.49%

-3.42%

-0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

1.70%

-0.06%

Volatility

SWDA.L vs. VGVE.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) is 2.52%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing (VGVE.DE) has a volatility of 3.06%. This indicates that SWDA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGVE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWDA.LVGVE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.52%

3.06%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.29%

7.78%

-0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.19%

10.76%

-0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.30%

13.55%

-0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.50%

15.18%

-0.68%

SWDA.L vs. VGVE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWDA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VGVE.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SWDA.L vs. VGVE.DE - Dividend Comparison

SWDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VGVE.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGVE.DE
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing
1.06%1.22%1.36%1.59%1.93%1.22%1.40%1.67%1.95%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SWDA.L and VGVE.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, VGVE.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VGVE.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SWDA.L.

SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index, while VGVE.DE tracks FTSE Developed. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SWDA.L and 0.12% for VGVE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWDA.L and VGVE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer