VGVE.DE vs. EUNL.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing (VGVE.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE).
VGVE.DE and EUNL.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VGVE.DE is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE Developed. It was launched on Sep 30, 2014. EUNL.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2009. Both VGVE.DE and EUNL.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VGVE.DE or EUNL.DE.
Correlation
The correlation between VGVE.DE and EUNL.DE is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
VGVE.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
VGVE.DE:
2.11
EUNL.DE:
2.05
VGVE.DE:
2.88
EUNL.DE:
2.82
VGVE.DE:
1.42
EUNL.DE:
1.41
VGVE.DE:
2.95
EUNL.DE:
2.93
VGVE.DE:
13.85
EUNL.DE:
13.58
VGVE.DE:
1.74%
EUNL.DE:
1.76%
VGVE.DE:
11.50%
EUNL.DE:
11.61%
VGVE.DE:
-33.63%
EUNL.DE:
-33.63%
VGVE.DE:
-0.22%
EUNL.DE:
0.00%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VGVE.DE having a 4.63% return and EUNL.DE slightly higher at 4.79%.
VGVE.DE
4.63%
4.14%
16.90%
24.16%
12.08%
N/A
EUNL.DE
4.79%
4.36%
17.60%
25.06%
12.43%
11.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VGVE.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGVE.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than EUNL.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VGVE.DE vs. EUNL.DE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
VGVE.DE
EUNL.DE
VGVE.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing (VGVE.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VGVE.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Dividend Comparison
VGVE.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, while EUNL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGVE.DE Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing | 1.30% | 1.36% | 1.59% | 1.94% | 1.22% | 1.40% | 1.67% | 1.95% | 0.34% |
EUNL.DE iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
VGVE.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGVE.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.63%, roughly equal to the maximum EUNL.DE drawdown of -33.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGVE.DE and EUNL.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VGVE.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing (VGVE.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE) have volatilities of 4.06% and 4.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.