PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWDA.L vs. IUIT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWDA.L vs. IUIT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SWDA.L is traded in GBp, while IUIT.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUIT.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWDA.L achieves a 10.08% return, which is significantly lower than IUIT.L's 26.17% return. Over the past 10 years, SWDA.L has underperformed IUIT.L with an annualized return of 13.91%, while IUIT.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.54% annualized return.


SWDA.L

1D
0.15%
1M
5.12%
YTD
10.08%
6M
10.35%
1Y
27.25%
3Y*
17.68%
5Y*
13.06%
10Y*
13.91%

IUIT.L

1D
0.00%
1M
16.60%
YTD
26.17%
6M
24.49%
1Y
56.60%
3Y*
31.96%
5Y*
26.05%
10Y*
27.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWDA.L vs. IUIT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.08%12.64%21.11%17.59%-8.33%23.64%12.25%23.03%-3.78%11.78%
IUIT.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF
23.54%14.17%40.92%51.48%-20.73%35.36%38.94%43.23%4.43%25.62%

Correlation

The correlation between SWDA.L and IUIT.L is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2015

0.78

The correlation between SWDA.L and IUIT.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

SWDA.L vs. IUIT.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SWDA.L
IUIT.L

Technology

30.0%
99.6%

Financial Services

15.4%

-

Industrials

10.9%
0.0%

Communication Services

9.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%

-

Healthcare

8.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.2%

-

Energy

4.2%
0.1%

Basic Materials

3.2%

-

Utilities

2.5%

-

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Technology

SWDA.L
30.0%
IUIT.L
99.6%

Financial Services

SWDA.L
15.4%
IUIT.L

-

Industrials

SWDA.L
10.9%
IUIT.L
0.0%

Communication Services

SWDA.L
9.2%
IUIT.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

SWDA.L
9.0%
IUIT.L

-

Healthcare

SWDA.L
8.7%
IUIT.L

-

Consumer Defensive

SWDA.L
5.2%
IUIT.L

-

Energy

SWDA.L
4.2%
IUIT.L
0.1%

Basic Materials

SWDA.L
3.2%
IUIT.L

-

Utilities

SWDA.L
2.5%
IUIT.L

-

Real Estate

SWDA.L
1.8%
IUIT.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWDA.L vs. IUIT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWDA.L
SWDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

IUIT.L
IUIT.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
IUIT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWDA.L vs. IUIT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SWDA.LIUIT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.46

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.14

3.32

+0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.55

8.42

+8.13

SWDA.L vs. IUIT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is comparable to the IUIT.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWDA.L and IUIT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SWDA.LIUIT.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

2.78

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

1.14

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

1.26

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

1.24

-0.35

Drawdowns

SWDA.L vs. IUIT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWDA.L drawdown since its inception was -25.58%, smaller than the maximum IUIT.L drawdown of -28.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWDA.L and IUIT.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWDA.LIUIT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.58%

-28.01%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.55%

-16.96%

+10.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.50%

-28.01%

+9.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.50%

-28.01%

+9.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.58%

-28.01%

+2.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-0.78%

+0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.49%

-5.29%

+1.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

6.70%

-5.06%

Volatility

SWDA.L vs. IUIT.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) is 2.52%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that SWDA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUIT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWDA.LIUIT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.52%

7.16%

-4.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.29%

15.20%

-7.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.19%

20.23%

-10.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.30%

22.82%

-9.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.50%

22.51%

-8.01%

SWDA.L vs. IUIT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWDA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IUIT.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SWDA.L vs. IUIT.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SWDA.L nor IUIT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SWDA.L and IUIT.L have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUIT.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUIT.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SWDA.L.

SWDA.L is categorized as Global Equities, while IUIT.L is Technology Equities. SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index, while IUIT.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SWDA.L and 0.15% for IUIT.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWDA.L and IUIT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer