SWDA.L vs. IBIT
SWDA.L (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SWDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SWDA.L returned 27.05% vs -36.08% for IBIT. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SWDA.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.
Performance
SWDA.L vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SWDA.L is traded in GBp, while IBIT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IBIT values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWDA.L achieves a 10.17% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -23.65% return.
SWDA.L
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 10.17%
- 6M
- 10.55%
- 1Y
- 27.05%
- 3Y*
- 17.68%
- 5Y*
- 12.78%
- 10Y*
- 14.16%
IBIT
- 1D
- 4.65%
- 1M
- -16.37%
- YTD
- -23.65%
- 6M
- -22.66%
- 1Y
- -36.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SWDA.L vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.17% | 12.64% | 21.84% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -23.65% | -13.08% | 93.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWDA.L and IBIT is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWDA.L vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
SWDA.L
IBIT
SWDA.L vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SWDA.L | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 0.87 | +0.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.11 | -0.70 | +4.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.14 | -1.22 | +17.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SWDA.L vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWDA.L drawdown since its inception was -41.70%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -51.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWDA.L and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWDA.L | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.70% | -51.61% | +9.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.55% | -51.61% | +45.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -46.80% | +46.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.49% | -17.13% | +7.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | 29.56% | -27.89% |
Volatility
SWDA.L vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) is 3.25%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 12.67%. This indicates that SWDA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWDA.L | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.25% | 12.67% | -9.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.73% | 33.74% | -26.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.52% | 43.24% | -32.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.35% | 49.66% | -36.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.59% | 49.66% | -35.07% |
SWDA.L vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWDA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SWDA.L vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
Neither SWDA.L nor IBIT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SWDA.L and IBIT have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SWDA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SWDA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.
SWDA.L is categorized as Global Equities, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SWDA.L and 0.25% for IBIT.
Find the right allocation for SWDA.L and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer