PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SWDA.L vs. HMCH.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SWDA.L vs. HMCH.L

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

SWDA.L (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and HMCH.L (HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SWDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index, while HMCH.L is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SWDA.L returned 13.92%/yr vs 5.62%/yr for HMCH.L. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SWDA.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for HMCH.L.

Performance

SWDA.L vs. HMCH.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) and HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF (HMCH.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWDA.L achieves a 8.84% return, which is significantly higher than HMCH.L's -9.14% return. Over the past 10 years, SWDA.L has outperformed HMCH.L with an annualized return of 13.92%, while HMCH.L has yielded a comparatively lower 5.62% annualized return.

SWDA.L

1D
1.55%
1M
1.62%
YTD
8.84%
6M
9.32%
1Y
24.97%
3Y*
17.08%
5Y*
12.61%
10Y*
13.92%

HMCH.L

1D
1.54%
1M
-8.16%
YTD
-9.14%
6M
-10.19%
1Y
2.02%
3Y*
6.48%
5Y*
-4.30%
10Y*
5.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWDA.L vs. HMCH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		8.84%12.64%21.11%17.59%-8.33%23.64%12.25%23.03%-3.78%11.78%
HMCH.L
HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF		-9.14%22.87%20.73%-16.33%-13.40%-21.05%24.97%17.80%-14.28%40.24%

Correlation

The correlation between SWDA.L and HMCH.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2011

0.58

The correlation between SWDA.L and HMCH.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (3 years) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SWDA.L vs. HMCH.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
SWDA.L
HMCH.L

Technology

30.8%
12.2%

Financial Services

15.1%
18.8%

Industrials

10.9%
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
24.9%

Communication Services

9.1%
18.1%

Healthcare

8.6%
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
3.0%

Energy

3.9%
3.7%

Basic Materials

3.2%
5.5%

Utilities

2.4%
1.8%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.6%

Technology

SWDA.L
30.8%
HMCH.L
12.2%

Financial Services

SWDA.L
15.1%
HMCH.L
18.8%

Industrials

SWDA.L
10.9%
HMCH.L
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SWDA.L
9.3%
HMCH.L
24.9%

Communication Services

SWDA.L
9.1%
HMCH.L
18.1%

Healthcare

SWDA.L
8.6%
HMCH.L
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

SWDA.L
5.0%
HMCH.L
3.0%

Energy

SWDA.L
3.9%
HMCH.L
3.7%

Basic Materials

SWDA.L
3.2%
HMCH.L
5.5%

Utilities

SWDA.L
2.4%
HMCH.L
1.8%

Real Estate

SWDA.L
1.7%
HMCH.L
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF

Often compared with SWDA.L:
SWDA.L vs. IWDA.LSWDA.L vs. VWRP.LSWDA.L vs. VWCE.DESWDA.L vs. SPYSWDA.L vs. IUSQ.DESWDA.L vs. EUN.LSWDA.L vs. VOO
Often compared with HMCH.L:
HMCH.L vs. HMCD.LHMCH.L vs. XCHA.DEHMCH.L vs. HMCT.LHMCH.L vs. BYDDYHMCH.L vs. VOOHMCH.L vs. ^GSPCHMCH.L vs. VUSA.AS

Return for Risk

SWDA.L vs. HMCH.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SWDA.L
SWDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
HMCH.L
HMCH.L Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
HMCH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMCH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMCH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
HMCH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMCH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWDA.L vs. HMCH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) and HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF (HMCH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

SWDA.LHMCH.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.38
0.11

+2.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.31
0.28

+3.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.03

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.80

0.11

+3.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.90

0.23

+14.67

SWDA.L vs. HMCH.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is higher than the HMCH.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWDA.L and HMCH.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWDA.L vs. HMCH.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWDA.L drawdown since its inception was -41.70%, smaller than the maximum HMCH.L drawdown of -56.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWDA.L and HMCH.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SWDA.LHMCH.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.70%

-56.50%

+14.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.55%

-18.43%

+11.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.50%

-24.67%

+6.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.50%

-49.31%

+30.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.58%

-56.50%

+30.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-34.05%

+32.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.49%

-20.11%

+10.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

8.61%

-6.94%

Volatility

SWDA.L vs. HMCH.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) is 3.28%, while HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF (HMCH.L) has a volatility of 6.28%. This indicates that SWDA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HMCH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SWDA.LHMCH.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

6.28%

-3.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.65%

13.19%

-5.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.47%

18.49%

-8.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.34%

27.70%

-14.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.58%

25.22%

-10.64%

SWDA.L vs. HMCH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWDA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than HMCH.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

SWDA.L vs. HMCH.L - Dividend Comparison

SWDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HMCH.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HMCH.L
HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF		2.20%2.34%2.17%2.12%1.85%1.28%0.92%1.65%1.36%0.78%1.89%2.84%
SWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

SWDA.L and HMCH.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SWDA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SWDA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for HMCH.L.

SWDA.L is categorized as Global Equities, while HMCH.L is China Equities. SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index, while HMCH.L tracks MSCI China NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SWDA.L and 0.30% for HMCH.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWDA.L and HMCH.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer