SWAN vs. PTIN

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

SWAN (Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF) and PTIN (Pacer Trendpilot International ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds - SWAN tracks the S-Network BlackSwan Core Index while PTIN tracks the Pacer Trendpilot International Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SWAN returned 2.02%/yr vs 6.71%/yr for PTIN. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SWAN charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for PTIN.

Performance

SWAN vs. PTIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) and Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWAN achieves a 2.62% return, which is significantly lower than PTIN's 16.34% return.

SWAN

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -1.30%
• 6M: 2.43%
• YTD: 2.62%
• 1Y: 9.98%
• 3Y*: 11.32%
• 5Y*: 2.02%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.65%

PTIN

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: 0.27%
• 6M: 9.19%
• YTD: 16.34%
• 1Y: 32.43%
• 3Y*: 12.31%
• 5Y*: 6.71%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PTIN Pacer Trendpilot International ETF	$300.58K	$334.58K	$457.99K
SWAN Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF	$317.13K	$268.94K	$360.70K

SWAN vs. PTIN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SWAN Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF	2.62%	13.93%	13.44%	12.07%	-27.77%	10.55%	16.17%	11.31%
PTIN Pacer Trendpilot International ETF	16.34%	16.17%	3.36%	16.04%	-15.98%	12.26%	-0.56%	6.75%

Correlation

The correlation between SWAN and PTIN is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.67
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2019	0.53

Over the past year, SWAN and PTIN have become more correlated (0.77) than their long-term average of 0.53, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

SWAN vs. PTIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SWAN

SWAN Risk / Return Rank: 40
SWAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
SWAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
SWAN Omega Ratio Rank: 37
SWAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
SWAN Martin Ratio Rank: 45

PTIN

PTIN Risk / Return Rank: 79
PTIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
PTIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
PTIN Omega Ratio Rank: 80
PTIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
PTIN Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SWAN vs. PTIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) and Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SWAN	PTIN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.98	1.83	-0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.43	2.51	-1.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.34	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.41	2.80	-1.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.00	10.30	-5.30

SWAN vs. PTIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWAN Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the PTIN Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWAN and PTIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SWAN vs. PTIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWAN drawdown since its inception was -31.04%, which is greater than PTIN's maximum drawdown of -21.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWAN and PTIN.

Drawdown Indicators

	SWAN	PTIN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.04%	-21.27%	-9.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.05%	-11.55%	+4.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.19%	-13.93%	+3.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.04%	-21.27%	-9.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.06%	-2.02%	-1.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.74%	-7.56%	-1.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.98%	3.13%	-1.15%

Volatility

SWAN vs. PTIN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) is 2.85%, while Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) has a volatility of 5.26%. This indicates that SWAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SWAN	PTIN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.85%	5.26%	-2.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.17%	15.77%	-7.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.11%	17.72%	-7.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.47%	14.74%	-3.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.45%	14.12%	-1.67%

SWAN vs. PTIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWAN has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than PTIN's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

SWAN vs. PTIN - Dividend Comparison

SWAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, more than PTIN's 2.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PTIN Pacer Trendpilot International ETF	2.18%	2.53%	2.67%	2.09%	0.41%	2.38%	0.77%	0.97%	0.00%
SWAN Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF	3.25%	2.86%	2.54%	2.98%	2.12%	5.04%	1.64%	3.69%	0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SWAN and PTIN in my portfolio?

SWAN and PTIN have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SWAN or PTIN?

PTIN has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to SWAN (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWAN dropped -31.04% vs PTIN's -21.27%.

Which ETF is better, SWAN or PTIN?

On 5-year performance, PTIN leads with 6.71% vs 2.02% for SWAN. On fees, SWAN is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, SWAN has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SWAN or PTIN?

Over the 5-year period, PTIN has performed better with a 6.71% return vs 2.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SWAN or PTIN?

SWAN is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for PTIN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SWAN or PTIN?

SWAN has the higher dividend yield at 3.25%, compared with 2.18% for PTIN.

What is the main difference between SWAN and PTIN?

SWAN tracks S-Network BlackSwan Core Index, while PTIN tracks Pacer Trendpilot International Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SWAN and 0.66% for PTIN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PTIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.