SWAN vs. MFUL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SWAN (Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF) and MFUL (Mindful Conservative ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. SWAN is passively managed, while MFUL is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SWAN returned 12.85%/yr vs 4.96%/yr for MFUL. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SWAN charges 0.49%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for MFUL.

Performance

SWAN vs. MFUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWAN achieves a 5.21% return, which is significantly higher than MFUL's 3.28% return.

SWAN

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: 3.71%
• YTD: 5.21%
• 6M: 4.34%
• 1Y: 17.67%
• 3Y*: 12.85%
• 5Y*: 3.38%
• 10Y*: —

MFUL

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 1.45%
• YTD: 3.28%
• 6M: 3.33%
• 1Y: 7.13%
• 3Y*: 4.96%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWAN vs. MFUL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SWAN Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF	5.21%	13.93%	13.44%	12.07%	-27.77%	0.73%
MFUL Mindful Conservative ETF	3.28%	4.51%	5.36%	2.24%	-12.46%	-1.61%

Correlation

The correlation between SWAN and MFUL is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2021	0.70

The correlation between SWAN and MFUL shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (all time) to 0.83 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SWAN vs. MFUL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SWAN	MFUL
Technology	35.6%	25.8%
Financial Services	11.8%	10.7%
Communication Services	11.2%	8.4%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	8.7%
Healthcare	8.5%	8.4%
Industrials	8.3%	9.9%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	6.7%
Energy	3.5%	8.0%
Utilities	2.4%	5.5%
Real Estate	1.9%	2.4%
Basic Materials	1.8%	5.5%

Return for Risk

SWAN vs. MFUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWAN

SWAN Risk / Return Rank: 54
SWAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
SWAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
SWAN Omega Ratio Rank: 54
SWAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
SWAN Martin Ratio Rank: 56

MFUL

MFUL Risk / Return Rank: 52
MFUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
MFUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
MFUL Omega Ratio Rank: 58
MFUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
MFUL Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWAN vs. MFUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SWAN	MFUL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	1.82	+0.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.71	2.59	+0.12
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.35	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.52	2.13	+0.39
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.93	8.24	+1.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SWAN vs. MFUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWAN Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the MFUL Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWAN and MFUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SWAN	MFUL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.89	1.82	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.01	+0.57

Drawdowns

SWAN vs. MFUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWAN drawdown since its inception was -31.04%, which is greater than MFUL's maximum drawdown of -16.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWAN and MFUL.

Drawdown Indicators

	SWAN	MFUL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.04%	-16.41%	-14.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.05%	-3.36%	-3.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.07%	-4.74%	-7.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.61%	-0.46%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.88%	-9.50%	+0.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.78%	0.87%	+0.91%

Volatility

SWAN vs. MFUL - Volatility Comparison

Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) has a higher volatility of 3.48% compared to Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL) at 1.46%. This indicates that SWAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SWAN	MFUL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.48%	1.46%	+2.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.28%	3.23%	+4.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.39%	3.93%	+5.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.33%	4.24%	+7.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.47%	4.24%	+8.23%

SWAN vs. MFUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWAN has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than MFUL's 1.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

SWAN vs. MFUL - Dividend Comparison

SWAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than MFUL's 3.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MFUL Mindful Conservative ETF	3.01%	3.31%	2.59%	5.00%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SWAN Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF	2.79%	2.86%	2.54%	2.98%	2.12%	5.04%	1.64%	3.69%	0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SWAN and MFUL in my portfolio?

SWAN and MFUL have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SWAN or MFUL?

SWAN has higher volatility (3.48%) compared to MFUL (1.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWAN dropped -31.04% vs MFUL's -16.41%.

Which ETF is better, SWAN or MFUL?

On 3-year performance, SWAN leads with 12.85% vs 4.96% for MFUL. On fees, SWAN is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, MFUL has been the lower-risk option at 1.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SWAN or MFUL?

Over the 3-year period, SWAN has performed better with a 12.85% return vs 4.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SWAN or MFUL?

SWAN is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for MFUL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SWAN or MFUL?

MFUL has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 2.79% for SWAN.

What is the main difference between SWAN and MFUL?

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Mohr Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SWAN and 1.10% for MFUL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SWAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.