PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWAN vs. MFUL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SWAN vs. MFUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SWAN vs. MFUL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SWAN
Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF
-3.58%13.93%13.44%12.07%-27.77%0.73%
MFUL
Mindful Conservative ETF
-0.53%4.51%5.36%2.24%-12.46%-1.61%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWAN achieves a -3.58% return, which is significantly lower than MFUL's -0.53% return.


SWAN

1D
1.86%
1M
-5.08%
YTD
-3.58%
6M
-2.03%
1Y
11.49%
3Y*
9.86%
5Y*
2.53%
10Y*

MFUL

1D
0.74%
1M
-2.62%
YTD
-0.53%
6M
-0.41%
1Y
3.24%
3Y*
3.76%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SWAN vs. MFUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWAN has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than MFUL's 1.10% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SWAN vs. MFUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWAN
SWAN Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SWAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWAN Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SWAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWAN Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

MFUL
MFUL Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
MFUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFUL Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MFUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFUL Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWAN vs. MFUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SWANMFULDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.18

0.69

+0.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.70

0.94

+0.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.14

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

0.94

+0.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.45

3.33

+3.12

SWAN vs. MFUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWAN Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is higher than the MFUL Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWAN and MFUL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SWANMFULDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

0.69

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

-0.20

+0.68

Correlation

The correlation between SWAN and MFUL is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

SWAN vs. MFUL - Dividend Comparison

SWAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, less than MFUL's 3.13% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
SWAN
Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF
3.04%2.86%2.54%2.98%2.12%5.04%1.64%3.69%0.29%
MFUL
Mindful Conservative ETF
3.13%3.31%2.59%5.00%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SWAN vs. MFUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWAN drawdown since its inception was -31.04%, which is greater than MFUL's maximum drawdown of -16.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWAN and MFUL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SWANMFULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.04%

-16.41%

-14.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.05%

-3.77%

-3.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.18%

-4.13%

-1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.07%

-9.80%

+0.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

1.06%

+0.77%

Volatility

SWAN vs. MFUL - Volatility Comparison

Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) has a higher volatility of 4.11% compared to Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL) at 1.89%. This indicates that SWAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SWANMFULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

1.89%

+2.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.86%

3.10%

+3.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.77%

4.75%

+5.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.27%

4.22%

+7.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.50%

4.22%

+8.28%