SWAN vs. HISF
SWAN (Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF) and HISF (First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. SWAN is passively managed, while HISF is actively managed. Over the past year, SWAN returned 17.67% vs 5.74% for HISF. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SWAN charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for HISF.
Performance
SWAN vs. HISF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWAN achieves a 5.21% return, which is significantly higher than HISF's 0.03% return.
SWAN
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 3.71%
- YTD
- 5.21%
- 6M
- 4.34%
- 1Y
- 17.67%
- 3Y*
- 12.85%
- 5Y*
- 3.38%
- 10Y*
- —
HISF
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 0.03%
- 6M
- 0.23%
- 1Y
- 5.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SWAN vs. HISF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SWAN Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF | 5.21% | 13.93% | 10.85% |
HISF First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF | 0.03% | 8.39% | 3.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWAN and HISF is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 2024 | 0.63 |
The correlation between SWAN and HISF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWAN vs. HISF — Risk / Return Rank
SWAN
HISF
SWAN vs. HISF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) and First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF (HISF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWAN | HISF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.89 | 1.74 | +0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.71 | 2.55 | +0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.32 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | 1.99 | +0.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.93 | 7.21 | +2.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWAN | HISF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | 1.74 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 1.31 | -0.73 |
Drawdowns
SWAN vs. HISF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWAN drawdown since its inception was -31.04%, which is greater than HISF's maximum drawdown of -3.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWAN and HISF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWAN | HISF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.04% | -3.86% | -27.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.05% | -2.90% | -4.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.61% | -1.20% | +0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.88% | -0.89% | -7.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 0.80% | +0.98% |
Volatility
SWAN vs. HISF - Volatility Comparison
Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) has a higher volatility of 3.48% compared to First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF (HISF) at 1.21%. This indicates that SWAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HISF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWAN | HISF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.48% | 1.21% | +2.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.28% | 2.61% | +4.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.39% | 3.32% | +6.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.33% | 3.95% | +7.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.47% | 3.95% | +8.52% |
SWAN vs. HISF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWAN has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than HISF's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
SWAN vs. HISF - Dividend Comparison
SWAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than HISF's 5.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HISF First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF | 5.00% | 4.69% | 3.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SWAN Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF | 2.79% | 2.86% | 2.54% | 2.98% | 2.12% | 5.04% | 1.64% | 3.69% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SWAN and HISF have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SWAN has higher volatility (3.48%) compared to HISF (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWAN dropped -31.04% vs HISF's -3.86%.
On 1-year performance, SWAN leads with 17.67% vs 5.74% for HISF. On fees, SWAN is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, HISF has been the lower-risk option at 1.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SWAN has performed better with a 17.67% return vs 5.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SWAN is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for HISF.
HISF has the higher dividend yield at 5.00%, compared with 2.79% for SWAN.
They also come from different issuers: Amplify and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SWAN and 0.87% for HISF.
SWAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SWAN and HISF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer