PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWAN vs. BITY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWAN vs. BITY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) and Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWAN achieves a 5.21% return, which is significantly higher than BITY's -23.09% return.


SWAN

1D
-0.61%
1M
3.71%
YTD
5.21%
6M
4.34%
1Y
17.67%
3Y*
12.85%
5Y*
3.38%
10Y*

BITY

1D
-2.61%
1M
-19.63%
YTD
-23.09%
6M
-26.69%
1Y
-37.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWAN vs. BITY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SWAN and BITY is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2025

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWAN vs. BITY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWAN
SWAN Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SWAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWAN Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SWAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWAN Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

BITY
BITY Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BITY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITY Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BITY Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITY Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWAN vs. BITY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) and Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SWANBITYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.89

-0.94

+2.83

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.71

-1.30

+4.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

0.85

+0.49

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

-0.81

+3.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.93

-1.41

+11.34

SWAN vs. BITY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWAN Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is higher than the BITY Sharpe Ratio of -0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWAN and BITY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SWANBITYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

-0.94

+2.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

-0.70

+1.28

Drawdowns

SWAN vs. BITY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWAN drawdown since its inception was -31.04%, smaller than the maximum BITY drawdown of -46.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWAN and BITY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWANBITYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.04%

-46.36%

+15.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.05%

-46.36%

+39.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-45.49%

+44.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.88%

-19.67%

+10.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

26.48%

-24.70%

Volatility

SWAN vs. BITY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) is 3.48%, while Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) has a volatility of 9.68%. This indicates that SWAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWANBITYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

9.68%

-6.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.28%

31.24%

-23.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.39%

39.94%

-30.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.33%

39.02%

-27.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.47%

39.02%

-26.55%

SWAN vs. BITY - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWAN has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than BITY's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

SWAN vs. BITY - Dividend Comparison

SWAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than BITY's 39.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BITY
Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF
39.66%21.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SWAN
Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF
2.79%2.86%2.54%2.98%2.12%5.04%1.64%3.69%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


SWAN and BITY have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITY has higher volatility (9.68%) compared to SWAN (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWAN dropped -31.04% vs BITY's -46.36%.

On 1-year performance, SWAN leads with 17.67% vs -37.35% for BITY. On fees, SWAN is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, SWAN has been the lower-risk option at 3.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SWAN has performed better with a 17.67% return vs -37.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SWAN is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BITY.

BITY has the higher dividend yield at 39.66%, compared with 2.79% for SWAN.

SWAN is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while BITY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SWAN and 0.65% for BITY.

SWAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWAN and BITY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer