SWAGX vs. FNSOX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

SWAGX (Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund) and FNSOX (Fidelity Short-Term Bond Index Fund) are both Total Bond Market funds. Over the past 5 years, SWAGX returned -0.03%/yr vs 1.60%/yr for FNSOX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SWAGX charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for FNSOX.

Performance

SWAGX vs. FNSOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (SWAGX) and Fidelity Short-Term Bond Index Fund (FNSOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SWAGX having a 0.38% return and FNSOX slightly lower at 0.37%.

SWAGX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.13%
• YTD: 0.38%
• 6M: 0.41%
• 1Y: 5.25%
• 3Y*: 3.97%
• 5Y*: -0.03%
• 10Y*: —

FNSOX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -0.03%
• YTD: 0.37%
• 6M: 0.72%
• 1Y: 3.77%
• 3Y*: 4.48%
• 5Y*: 1.60%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWAGX vs. FNSOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SWAGX Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund	0.38%	7.11%	1.38%	5.46%	-13.62%	-2.29%	7.39%	8.64%	-0.11%	0.34%
FNSOX Fidelity Short-Term Bond Index Fund	0.37%	6.01%	3.90%	4.90%	-5.76%	-1.25%	4.28%	4.95%	1.14%	-0.22%

Correlation

The correlation between SWAGX and FNSOX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2017	0.82

The correlation between SWAGX and FNSOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SWAGX vs. FNSOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWAGX

SWAGX Risk / Return Rank: 19
SWAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
SWAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
SWAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 16
SWAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
SWAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

FNSOX

FNSOX Risk / Return Rank: 44
FNSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
FNSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
FNSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
FNSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
FNSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWAGX vs. FNSOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (SWAGX) and Fidelity Short-Term Bond Index Fund (FNSOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SWAGX	FNSOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	1.78	-0.53
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.90	2.90	-1.00
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.36	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	2.71	-0.90
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.51	9.04	-3.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SWAGX vs. FNSOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the FNSOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWAGX and FNSOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SWAGX	FNSOX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.25	1.78	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.01	0.56	-0.56
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	0.84	-0.52

Drawdowns

SWAGX vs. FNSOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWAGX drawdown since its inception was -19.68%, which is greater than FNSOX's maximum drawdown of -8.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWAGX and FNSOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SWAGX	FNSOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.68%	-8.92%	-10.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.05%	-1.47%	-1.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.14%	-1.51%	-4.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.76%	-8.77%	-9.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.38%	-0.60%	-2.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.68%	-1.73%	-3.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.00%	0.44%	+0.56%

Volatility

SWAGX vs. FNSOX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (SWAGX) has a higher volatility of 1.35% compared to Fidelity Short-Term Bond Index Fund (FNSOX) at 0.68%. This indicates that SWAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNSOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SWAGX	FNSOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.35%	0.68%	+0.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.94%	1.51%	+1.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.03%	2.07%	+1.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.08%	2.89%	+3.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.12%	2.48%	+2.64%

SWAGX vs. FNSOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWAGX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than FNSOX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SWAGX vs. FNSOX - Dividend Comparison

SWAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, more than FNSOX's 3.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNSOX Fidelity Short-Term Bond Index Fund	3.53%	3.22%	2.80%	1.74%	0.81%	0.80%	1.54%	2.61%	2.04%	0.34%
SWAGX Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund	4.13%	4.02%	3.88%	3.22%	1.93%	1.56%	2.47%	2.87%	2.80%	1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SWAGX and FNSOX in my portfolio?

SWAGX and FNSOX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SWAGX or FNSOX?

SWAGX has higher volatility (1.35%) compared to FNSOX (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWAGX dropped -19.68% vs FNSOX's -8.92%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNSOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.