PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SVARX vs. PADZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SVARX vs. PADZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Spectrum Low Volatility Fund (SVARX) and PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund (PADZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SVARX achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly lower than PADZX's 2.18% return. Over the past 10 years, SVARX has outperformed PADZX with an annualized return of 6.11%, while PADZX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.31% annualized return.


SVARX

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.17%
YTD
1.06%
6M
1.24%
1Y
4.77%
3Y*
6.69%
5Y*
3.09%
10Y*
6.11%

PADZX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.29%
YTD
2.18%
6M
2.67%
1Y
5.57%
3Y*
6.29%
5Y*
3.90%
10Y*
4.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SVARX vs. PADZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SVARX
Spectrum Low Volatility Fund
1.06%6.22%2.60%9.67%-4.35%4.10%19.50%9.42%-0.99%8.25%
PADZX
PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund
2.18%5.10%7.48%6.11%-1.55%1.87%0.59%11.10%0.71%6.67%

Correlation

The correlation between SVARX and PADZX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2013

0.22

The correlation between SVARX and PADZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (5 years) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SVARX vs. PADZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SVARX
SVARX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SVARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVARX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SVARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVARX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

PADZX
PADZX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
PADZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PADZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
PADZX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
PADZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PADZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SVARX vs. PADZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Spectrum Low Volatility Fund (SVARX) and PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund (PADZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SVARXPADZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

2.65

-1.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

6.61

-4.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.32

23.84

-19.52

SVARX vs. PADZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SVARX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is lower than the PADZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SVARX and PADZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SVARX vs. PADZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SVARX drawdown since its inception was -6.48%, smaller than the maximum PADZX drawdown of -17.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVARX and PADZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SVARXPADZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.48%

-17.99%

+11.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.55%

-0.86%

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.55%

-0.98%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.48%

-4.05%

-2.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.48%

-17.99%

+11.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.73%

-0.86%

-0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.23%

-0.95%

-0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

0.24%

+0.91%

Volatility

SVARX vs. PADZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Spectrum Low Volatility Fund (SVARX) is 0.85%, while PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund (PADZX) has a volatility of 1.44%. This indicates that SVARX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PADZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SVARXPADZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.85%

1.44%

-0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.21%

1.80%

+0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71%

2.11%

+0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.10%

2.16%

+0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.63%

3.15%

+0.48%

SVARX vs. PADZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SVARX has a 2.34% expense ratio, which is higher than PADZX's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

SVARX vs. PADZX - Dividend Comparison

SVARX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.88%, more than PADZX's 5.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PADZX
PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund
5.08%5.07%5.18%4.09%2.89%2.40%3.41%10.79%5.02%2.75%2.36%2.38%
SVARX
Spectrum Low Volatility Fund
5.88%5.95%9.35%3.35%0.00%5.85%0.71%4.91%2.41%6.90%9.07%3.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


SVARX and PADZX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PADZX has higher volatility (1.44%) compared to SVARX (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SVARX dropped -6.48% vs PADZX's -17.99%.

PADZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SVARX and PADZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer