SVARX vs. LCSIX
SVARX (Spectrum Low Volatility Fund) and LCSIX (LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund) are both mutual funds - SVARX is a Nontraditional Bonds fund managed by Advisors Preferred, while LCSIX is a Systematic Trend fund managed by LoCorr Funds. Over the past 10 years, SVARX returned 5.92%/yr vs 2.61%/yr for LCSIX. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SVARX charges 2.34%/yr vs 1.75%/yr for LCSIX.
Performance
SVARX vs. LCSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SVARX achieves a 0.93% return, which is significantly higher than LCSIX's 0.58% return. Over the past 10 years, SVARX has outperformed LCSIX with an annualized return of 5.92%, while LCSIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.61% annualized return.
SVARX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- 4.98%
- 3Y*
- 6.22%
- 5Y*
- 2.98%
- 10Y*
- 5.92%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.81%
LCSIX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -1.14%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 0.58%
- 1Y
- -0.89%
- 3Y*
- -2.04%
- 5Y*
- 0.34%
- 10Y*
- 2.61%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.15%
SVARX vs. LCSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SVARX Spectrum Low Volatility Fund | 0.93% | 6.22% | 2.60% | 9.67% | -4.35% | 4.10% | 19.50% | 9.42% | -0.99% | 8.25% |
LCSIX LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund | 0.58% | 1.13% | -8.29% | -3.07% | 6.04% | 14.90% | 9.90% | -5.97% | 15.16% | 6.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between SVARX and LCSIX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2013 | 0.00 |
Over the past year, SVARX and LCSIX have become more correlated (0.25) than their long-term average of 0.00, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SVARX vs. LCSIX — Risk / Return Rank
SVARX
LCSIX
SVARX vs. LCSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Spectrum Low Volatility Fund (SVARX) and LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund (LCSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SVARX | LCSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 0.99 | +0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | -0.11 | +2.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.26 | -0.25 | +4.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SVARX vs. LCSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SVARX drawdown since its inception was -6.48%, smaller than the maximum LCSIX drawdown of -25.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVARX and LCSIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SVARX | LCSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.48% | -25.13% | +18.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.55% | -4.97% | +2.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.55% | -11.60% | +9.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.48% | -13.21% | +6.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -6.48% | -13.54% | +7.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.85% | -10.70% | +8.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.23% | -6.40% | +5.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.20% | 2.23% | -1.03% |
Volatility
SVARX vs. LCSIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Spectrum Low Volatility Fund (SVARX) is 0.56%, while LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund (LCSIX) has a volatility of 1.36%. This indicates that SVARX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SVARX | LCSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.56% | 1.36% | -0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.17% | 4.70% | -2.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.62% | 5.91% | -3.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.08% | 5.51% | -2.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.60% | 6.65% | -3.05% |
SVARX vs. LCSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SVARX has a 2.34% expense ratio, which is higher than LCSIX's 1.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SVARX vs. LCSIX - Dividend Comparison
SVARX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.89%, more than LCSIX's 2.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCSIX LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund | 2.30% | 2.32% | 2.75% | 1.88% | 10.75% | 7.14% | 2.94% | 0.54% | 12.36% | 0.02% | 3.21% | 7.36% |
SVARX Spectrum Low Volatility Fund | 5.89% | 5.95% | 9.35% | 3.35% | 0.00% | 5.85% | 0.71% | 4.91% | 2.41% | 6.90% | 9.07% | 3.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SVARX and LCSIX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LCSIX has higher volatility (1.36%) compared to SVARX (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SVARX dropped -6.48% vs LCSIX's -25.13%.
SVARX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SVARX and LCSIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer