SVAL vs. EPSV
SVAL (iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF) and EPSV (Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. SVAL is passively managed, while EPSV is actively managed. Over the past year, SVAL returned 34.88% vs 46.19% for EPSV. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SVAL charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for EPSV.
Performance
SVAL vs. EPSV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SVAL achieves a 15.99% return, which is significantly lower than EPSV's 26.42% return.
SVAL
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- 2.08%
- YTD
- 15.99%
- 6M
- 15.39%
- 1Y
- 34.88%
- 3Y*
- 17.30%
- 5Y*
- 6.47%
- 10Y*
- —
EPSV
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 7.26%
- YTD
- 26.42%
- 6M
- 26.98%
- 1Y
- 46.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SVAL vs. EPSV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SVAL iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF | 15.99% | 18.91% |
EPSV Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF | 26.42% | 20.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between SVAL and EPSV is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2025 | 0.87 |
The correlation between SVAL and EPSV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
SVAL vs. EPSV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SVAL
EPSV
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
SVAL
EPSV
Industrials
SVAL
EPSV
Consumer Cyclical
SVAL
EPSV
Technology
SVAL
EPSV
Healthcare
SVAL
EPSV
Energy
SVAL
EPSV
Basic Materials
SVAL
EPSV
Consumer Defensive
SVAL
EPSV
Utilities
SVAL
EPSV
Real Estate
SVAL
EPSV
Communication Services
SVAL
EPSV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SVAL vs. EPSV — Risk / Return Rank
SVAL
EPSV
SVAL vs. EPSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF (SVAL) and Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF (EPSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SVAL | EPSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.46 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.92 | 5.19 | -1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.29 | 18.03 | -5.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SVAL | EPSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | 2.62 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 2.66 | -1.96 |
Drawdowns
SVAL vs. EPSV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SVAL drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, which is greater than EPSV's maximum drawdown of -8.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVAL and EPSV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SVAL | EPSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.44% | -8.93% | -18.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.94% | -8.93% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.51% | -0.04% | -1.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.51% | -1.67% | -6.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 2.57% | +0.28% |
Volatility
SVAL vs. EPSV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF (SVAL) is 4.31%, while Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF (EPSV) has a volatility of 6.05%. This indicates that SVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SVAL | EPSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 6.05% | -1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.62% | 12.80% | -1.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.87% | 17.75% | +0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.33% | 18.14% | +4.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.27% | 18.14% | +5.13% |
SVAL vs. EPSV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SVAL has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EPSV's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
SVAL vs. EPSV - Dividend Comparison
SVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, which matches EPSV's 2.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPSV Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF | 2.28% | 2.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SVAL iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF | 2.27% | 2.33% | 1.82% | 2.25% | 2.09% | 2.33% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SVAL and EPSV have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EPSV has higher volatility (6.05%) compared to SVAL (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SVAL dropped -27.44% vs EPSV's -8.93%.
On 1-year performance, EPSV leads with 46.19% vs 34.88% for SVAL. On fees, SVAL is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SVAL has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EPSV has performed better with a 46.19% return vs 34.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SVAL is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for EPSV.
SVAL and EPSV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 2.27%.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SVAL and 0.88% for EPSV.
EPSV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SVAL and EPSV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer