PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUWG.L vs. PRWU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SUWG.L vs. PRWU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SUWG.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRWU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SUWG.L is traded in GBP, while PRWU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PRWU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


SUWG.L

1D
0.39%
1M
4.00%
YTD
10.28%
6M
10.19%
1Y
21.97%
3Y*
13.08%
5Y*
10.67%
10Y*

PRWU.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUWG.L vs. PRWU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SUWG.L
iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
10.28%7.24%12.94%18.32%1.72%
PRWU.L
Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C)
0.00%0.00%20.63%18.25%1.23%

Correlation

The correlation between SUWG.L and PRWU.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022

0.62

The correlation between SUWG.L and PRWU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

SUWG.L vs. PRWU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SUWG.L
PRWU.L

Technology

32.7%
27.0%

Financial Services

16.6%
15.8%

Industrials

11.2%
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
10.5%

Healthcare

9.0%
10.7%

Communication Services

7.7%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

6.0%
6.1%

Basic Materials

3.8%
3.2%

Real Estate

2.2%
2.1%

Utilities

1.7%
2.7%

Energy

-

4.0%

Technology

SUWG.L
32.7%
PRWU.L
27.0%

Financial Services

SUWG.L
16.6%
PRWU.L
15.8%

Industrials

SUWG.L
11.2%
PRWU.L
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SUWG.L
9.1%
PRWU.L
10.5%

Healthcare

SUWG.L
9.0%
PRWU.L
10.7%

Communication Services

SUWG.L
7.7%
PRWU.L
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

SUWG.L
6.0%
PRWU.L
6.1%

Basic Materials

SUWG.L
3.8%
PRWU.L
3.2%

Real Estate

SUWG.L
2.2%
PRWU.L
2.1%

Utilities

SUWG.L
1.7%
PRWU.L
2.7%

Energy

SUWG.L

-

PRWU.L
4.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUWG.L vs. PRWU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUWG.L
SUWG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SUWG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUWG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUWG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SUWG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUWG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

PRWU.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUWG.L vs. PRWU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SUWG.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRWU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SUWG.LPRWU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.28

SUWG.L vs. PRWU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SUWG.LPRWU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

Drawdowns

SUWG.L vs. PRWU.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUWG.LPRWU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

Volatility

SUWG.L vs. PRWU.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUWG.LPRWU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.63%

SUWG.L vs. PRWU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUWG.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than PRWU.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SUWG.L vs. PRWU.L - Dividend Comparison

SUWG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, while PRWU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
PRWU.L
Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SUWG.L
iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.12%1.21%1.38%1.54%1.69%1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


SUWG.L and PRWU.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRWU.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRWU.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SUWG.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SUWG.L and 0.05% for PRWU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUWG.L and PRWU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer