SUWG.L vs. IWDA.L
SUWG.L (iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and IWDA.L (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds from iShares - SUWG.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD while IWDA.L tracks the MSCI World Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SUWG.L returned 10.67%/yr vs 13.06%/yr for IWDA.L. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.
Performance
SUWG.L vs. IWDA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SUWG.L is traded in GBP, while IWDA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IWDA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SUWG.L having a 10.28% return and IWDA.L slightly lower at 10.24%.
SUWG.L
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 4.00%
- YTD
- 10.28%
- 6M
- 10.19%
- 1Y
- 21.97%
- 3Y*
- 13.08%
- 5Y*
- 10.67%
- 10Y*
- —
IWDA.L
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 3.73%
- YTD
- 10.24%
- 6M
- 10.04%
- 1Y
- 27.06%
- 3Y*
- 17.73%
- 5Y*
- 13.06%
- 10Y*
- 13.91%
SUWG.L vs. IWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUWG.L iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 10.28% | 7.24% | 12.94% | 18.32% | -11.70% | 27.80% |
IWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.24% | 12.41% | 21.19% | 18.05% | -8.38% | 23.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between SUWG.L and IWDA.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2021 | 0.88 |
The correlation between SUWG.L and IWDA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
SUWG.L vs. IWDA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SUWG.L
IWDA.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
-
Technology
SUWG.L
IWDA.L
Financial Services
SUWG.L
IWDA.L
Industrials
SUWG.L
IWDA.L
Consumer Cyclical
SUWG.L
IWDA.L
Healthcare
SUWG.L
IWDA.L
Communication Services
SUWG.L
IWDA.L
Consumer Defensive
SUWG.L
IWDA.L
Basic Materials
SUWG.L
IWDA.L
Real Estate
SUWG.L
IWDA.L
Utilities
SUWG.L
IWDA.L
Energy
SUWG.L
-
IWDA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SUWG.L vs. IWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank
SUWG.L
IWDA.L
SUWG.L vs. IWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SUWG.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SUWG.L | IWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.44 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | 4.25 | -1.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.28 | 15.98 | -5.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SUWG.L | IWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 2.33 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.90 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.86 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
SUWG.L vs. IWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SUWG.L drawdown since its inception was -18.97%, smaller than the maximum IWDA.L drawdown of -26.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUWG.L and IWDA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SUWG.L | IWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.97% | -26.18% | +7.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.92% | -6.37% | -1.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.97% | -18.91% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.97% | -18.91% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.10% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.31% | -3.39% | -0.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 1.70% | +0.42% |
Volatility
SUWG.L vs. IWDA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SUWG.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L) have volatilities of 3.37% and 3.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SUWG.L | IWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.37% | 3.39% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.65% | 8.83% | -0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.38% | 11.60% | -0.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.65% | 14.49% | -0.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.63% | 15.51% | -1.88% |
SUWG.L vs. IWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SUWG.L and IWDA.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SUWG.L vs. IWDA.L - Dividend Comparison
SUWG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, while IWDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SUWG.L iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.12% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.54% | 1.69% | 1.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SUWG.L and IWDA.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SUWG.L and IWDA.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.
SUWG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while IWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index (Net).
Find the right allocation for SUWG.L and IWDA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer