SUWG.L vs. FCSG.L
SUWG.L (iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and FCSG.L (First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation) are both Global Equities funds tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, from iShares and First Trust respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SUWG.L returned 10.67%/yr vs 5.92%/yr for FCSG.L. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SUWG.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FCSG.L.
Performance
SUWG.L vs. FCSG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SUWG.L is traded in GBP, while FCSG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FCSG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SUWG.L achieves a 10.28% return, which is significantly higher than FCSG.L's -1.69% return.
SUWG.L
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 4.00%
- YTD
- 10.28%
- 6M
- 10.19%
- 1Y
- 21.97%
- 3Y*
- 13.08%
- 5Y*
- 10.67%
- 10Y*
- —
FCSG.L
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 1.84%
- YTD
- -1.69%
- 6M
- -1.06%
- 1Y
- -0.11%
- 3Y*
- 6.29%
- 5Y*
- 5.92%
- 10Y*
- —
SUWG.L vs. FCSG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUWG.L iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 10.28% | 7.24% | 12.94% | 18.32% | -11.70% | 26.34% |
FCSG.L First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation | -1.69% | 3.93% | 11.42% | 6.17% | -3.68% | 23.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between SUWG.L and FCSG.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2021 | 0.68 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SUWG.L and FCSG.L has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SUWG.L vs. FCSG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SUWG.L
FCSG.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
-
Technology
SUWG.L
FCSG.L
Financial Services
SUWG.L
FCSG.L
Industrials
SUWG.L
FCSG.L
Consumer Cyclical
SUWG.L
FCSG.L
Healthcare
SUWG.L
FCSG.L
Communication Services
SUWG.L
FCSG.L
Consumer Defensive
SUWG.L
FCSG.L
Basic Materials
SUWG.L
FCSG.L
Real Estate
SUWG.L
FCSG.L
-
Utilities
SUWG.L
FCSG.L
-
Energy
SUWG.L
-
FCSG.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SUWG.L vs. FCSG.L — Risk / Return Rank
SUWG.L
FCSG.L
SUWG.L vs. FCSG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SUWG.L) and First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation (FCSG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SUWG.L | FCSG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.01 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | -0.01 | +2.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.28 | -0.04 | +10.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SUWG.L | FCSG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | -0.01 | +1.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.55 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.67 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
SUWG.L vs. FCSG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SUWG.L drawdown since its inception was -18.97%, which is greater than FCSG.L's maximum drawdown of -11.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUWG.L and FCSG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SUWG.L | FCSG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.97% | -11.39% | -7.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.92% | -7.80% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.97% | -9.70% | -9.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.97% | -11.39% | -7.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.95% | +4.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.31% | -2.65% | -1.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 3.12% | -1.00% |
Volatility
SUWG.L vs. FCSG.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SUWG.L) has a higher volatility of 3.37% compared to First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation (FCSG.L) at 2.83%. This indicates that SUWG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCSG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SUWG.L | FCSG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.37% | 2.83% | +0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.65% | 6.95% | +1.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.38% | 8.82% | +2.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.65% | 10.70% | +2.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.63% | 10.67% | +2.96% |
SUWG.L vs. FCSG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SUWG.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FCSG.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SUWG.L vs. FCSG.L - Dividend Comparison
SUWG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, while FCSG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCSG.L First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SUWG.L iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.12% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.54% | 1.69% | 1.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SUWG.L and FCSG.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SUWG.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SUWG.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FCSG.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SUWG.L and 0.75% for FCSG.L.
Find the right allocation for SUWG.L and FCSG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer