FCSG.L vs. AVGC.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation (FCSG.L) and Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AVGC.L).

FCSG.L and AVGC.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FCSG.L is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Mar 9, 2021. AVGC.L is a passively managed fund by Avantis that tracks the performance of the MSCI World IMI Index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2024. Both FCSG.L and AVGC.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

FCSG.L vs. AVGC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation (FCSG.L) and Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AVGC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FCSG.L vs. AVGC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FCSG.L First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation	-3.29%	6.25%
AVGC.L Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating	3.27%	24.84%

Different Trading Currencies

FCSG.L is traded in GBp, while AVGC.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AVGC.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCSG.L achieves a -3.29% return, which is significantly lower than AVGC.L's 3.27% return.

FCSG.L

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: -5.79%
• YTD: -3.29%
• 6M: -2.44%
• 1Y: -1.50%
• 3Y*: 6.47%
• 5Y*: 6.52%
• 10Y*: —

AVGC.L

• 1D: 2.36%
• 1M: -2.44%
• YTD: 3.27%
• 6M: 7.76%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCSG.L vs. AVGC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCSG.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than AVGC.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

FCSG.L

First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation

AVGC.L

Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating

Return for Risk

FCSG.L vs. AVGC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCSG.L

FCSG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8
FCSG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
FCSG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
FCSG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8
FCSG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
FCSG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCSG.L vs. AVGC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation (FCSG.L) and Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AVGC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCSG.L	AVGC.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.13	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.10	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.17	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.53	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCSG.L	AVGC.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	2.62	-1.96

Correlation

The correlation between FCSG.L and AVGC.L is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FCSG.L vs. AVGC.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FCSG.L nor AVGC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FCSG.L vs. AVGC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCSG.L drawdown since its inception was -11.39%, which is greater than AVGC.L's maximum drawdown of -6.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCSG.L and AVGC.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCSG.L	AVGC.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.39%	-7.96%	-3.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.80%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.49%	-4.78%	-1.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.56%	-1.03%	-1.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.55%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FCSG.L	AVGC.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.47%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.74%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.31%	11.93%	-0.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.73%	11.93%	-1.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.73%	11.93%	-1.20%