SUVZX vs. FGINX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

SUVZX (PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Value Fund) and FGINX (Delaware Growth and Income Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, SUVZX returned 12.80%/yr vs 13.47%/yr for FGINX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SUVZX charges 0.80%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for FGINX.

Performance

SUVZX vs. FGINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Value Fund (SUVZX) and Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUVZX achieves a 16.36% return, which is significantly lower than FGINX's 18.31% return. Over the past 10 years, SUVZX has underperformed FGINX with an annualized return of 12.80%, while FGINX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.47% annualized return.

SUVZX

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: 3.08%
• YTD: 16.36%
• 6M: 15.24%
• 1Y: 33.06%
• 3Y*: 23.96%
• 5Y*: 14.51%
• 10Y*: 12.80%

FGINX

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 2.79%
• YTD: 18.31%
• 6M: 17.62%
• 1Y: 42.96%
• 3Y*: 25.39%
• 5Y*: 17.28%
• 10Y*: 13.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUVZX vs. FGINX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SUVZX PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Value Fund	16.36%	17.92%	29.20%	9.39%	-6.46%	31.08%	-6.15%	28.63%	-14.99%	15.87%
FGINX Delaware Growth and Income Fund	18.31%	29.78%	15.13%	11.98%	3.03%	21.37%	-0.08%	25.64%	-10.27%	18.08%

Correlation

The correlation between SUVZX and FGINX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2002	0.93

The correlation between SUVZX and FGINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SUVZX vs. FGINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUVZX

SUVZX Risk / Return Rank: 93
SUVZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
SUVZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
SUVZX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
SUVZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
SUVZX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

FGINX

FGINX Risk / Return Rank: 96
FGINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FGINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
FGINX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
FGINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FGINX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUVZX vs. FGINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Value Fund (SUVZX) and Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SUVZX	FGINX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.97	3.71	-0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.21	5.08	-0.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.67	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.81	5.95	-0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.91	22.54	+0.37

SUVZX vs. FGINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUVZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.97, which is comparable to the FGINX Sharpe Ratio of 3.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUVZX and FGINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SUVZX vs. FGINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUVZX drawdown since its inception was -60.47%, which is greater than FGINX's maximum drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUVZX and FGINX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SUVZX	FGINX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.47%	-54.80%	-5.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.75%	-7.34%	+1.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.29%	-13.28%	-3.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.74%	-16.21%	-5.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.82%	-37.37%	-9.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.83%	-1.34%	+0.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.69%	-9.68%	-0.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.46%	1.93%	-0.47%

Volatility

SUVZX vs. FGINX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Value Fund (SUVZX) and Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX) have volatilities of 3.95% and 4.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SUVZX	FGINX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.95%	4.13%	-0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.47%	8.80%	-0.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.25%	11.76%	-0.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.91%	14.92%	+2.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.07%	17.06%	+4.01%

SUVZX vs. FGINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUVZX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than FGINX's 1.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

SUVZX vs. FGINX - Dividend Comparison

SUVZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.31%, more than FGINX's 9.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGINX Delaware Growth and Income Fund	9.31%	11.28%	12.40%	7.11%	7.04%	11.97%	6.59%	51.75%	25.36%	5.13%	4.12%	5.66%
SUVZX PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Value Fund	14.31%	16.65%	31.72%	3.81%	10.19%	9.27%	2.09%	10.08%	14.33%	9.58%	4.35%	18.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SUVZX and FGINX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, SUVZX and FGINX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SUVZX or FGINX?

FGINX has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to SUVZX (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUVZX dropped -60.47% vs FGINX's -54.80%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.71 vs 2.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.