SUVZX vs. ACTIX
SUVZX (PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Value Fund) and ACTIX (Advisors Capital Tactical Fixed Income Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, SUVZX returned 12.95%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for ACTIX. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SUVZX charges 0.80%/yr vs 2.09%/yr for ACTIX.
Performance
SUVZX vs. ACTIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SUVZX achieves a 15.71% return, which is significantly higher than ACTIX's 0.10% return.
SUVZX
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 3.78%
- YTD
- 15.71%
- 6M
- 16.74%
- 1Y
- 33.17%
- 3Y*
- 25.44%
- 5Y*
- 12.95%
- 10Y*
- 12.50%
ACTIX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 0.14%
- 1Y
- 4.17%
- 3Y*
- 4.53%
- 5Y*
- 0.77%
- 10Y*
- —
SUVZX vs. ACTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUVZX PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Value Fund | 15.71% | 17.92% | 29.20% | 9.39% | -6.46% | 11.17% |
ACTIX Advisors Capital Tactical Fixed Income Fund | 0.10% | 6.08% | 3.07% | 5.97% | -9.94% | 0.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between SUVZX and ACTIX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2021 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SUVZX vs. ACTIX — Risk / Return Rank
SUVZX
ACTIX
SUVZX vs. ACTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Value Fund (SUVZX) and Advisors Capital Tactical Fixed Income Fund (ACTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SUVZX | ACTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.20 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.79 | 1.37 | +4.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.05 | 4.73 | +18.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SUVZX | ACTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.07 | 1.09 | +1.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.16 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.22 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
SUVZX vs. ACTIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SUVZX drawdown since its inception was -60.47%, which is greater than ACTIX's maximum drawdown of -14.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUVZX and ACTIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SUVZX | ACTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.47% | -14.29% | -46.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.75% | -2.90% | -2.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.29% | -3.95% | -12.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.74% | -14.29% | -7.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.04% | +1.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.71% | -5.00% | -4.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.44% | 0.84% | +0.60% |
Volatility
SUVZX vs. ACTIX - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Value Fund (SUVZX) has a higher volatility of 2.84% compared to Advisors Capital Tactical Fixed Income Fund (ACTIX) at 1.19%. This indicates that SUVZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SUVZX | ACTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.84% | 1.19% | +1.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.00% | 2.81% | +5.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.89% | 3.65% | +7.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.90% | 4.67% | +13.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.05% | 4.61% | +16.44% |
SUVZX vs. ACTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SUVZX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than ACTIX's 2.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
SUVZX vs. ACTIX - Dividend Comparison
SUVZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.39%, more than ACTIX's 3.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACTIX Advisors Capital Tactical Fixed Income Fund | 3.08% | 3.09% | 3.18% | 2.44% | 1.10% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SUVZX PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Value Fund | 14.39% | 16.65% | 31.72% | 3.81% | 10.19% | 9.27% | 2.09% | 10.08% | 14.33% | 9.58% | 4.35% | 18.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SUVZX and ACTIX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SUVZX has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to ACTIX (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUVZX dropped -60.47% vs ACTIX's -14.29%.
SUVZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SUVZX and ACTIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer