PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUUS.L vs. XDNS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SUUS.L vs. XDNS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUUS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDNS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUUS.L achieves a 14.16% return, which is significantly lower than XDNS.L's 15.48% return.


SUUS.L

1D
0.16%
1M
6.64%
YTD
14.16%
6M
14.29%
1Y
25.89%
3Y*
14.75%
5Y*
12.42%
10Y*

XDNS.L

1D
-0.57%
1M
6.27%
YTD
15.48%
6M
14.59%
1Y
32.42%
3Y*
14.60%
5Y*
9.38%
10Y*
9.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUUS.L vs. XDNS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SUUS.L
iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
14.16%3.44%15.85%17.58%-8.97%32.89%21.52%27.36%2.89%12.51%
XDNS.L
Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D
15.48%16.58%9.87%11.58%-7.42%1.12%12.12%14.51%-10.22%14.74%

Correlation

The correlation between SUUS.L and XDNS.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2016

0.56

The correlation between SUUS.L and XDNS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (3 years) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SUUS.L vs. XDNS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SUUS.L
XDNS.L

Technology

41.6%
19.8%

Financial Services

11.8%
18.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
11.3%

Communication Services

9.1%
8.8%

Healthcare

8.6%
7.0%

Industrials

8.1%
25.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
2.6%

Basic Materials

2.5%
3.2%

Real Estate

2.1%
2.5%

Utilities

1.5%
0.6%

Energy

-

-

Technology

SUUS.L
41.6%
XDNS.L
19.8%

Financial Services

SUUS.L
11.8%
XDNS.L
18.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SUUS.L
9.3%
XDNS.L
11.3%

Communication Services

SUUS.L
9.1%
XDNS.L
8.8%

Healthcare

SUUS.L
8.6%
XDNS.L
7.0%

Industrials

SUUS.L
8.1%
XDNS.L
25.8%

Consumer Defensive

SUUS.L
5.4%
XDNS.L
2.6%

Basic Materials

SUUS.L
2.5%
XDNS.L
3.2%

Real Estate

SUUS.L
2.1%
XDNS.L
2.5%

Utilities

SUUS.L
1.5%
XDNS.L
0.6%

Energy

SUUS.L

-

XDNS.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUUS.L vs. XDNS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUUS.L
SUUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SUUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SUUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

XDNS.L
XDNS.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XDNS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDNS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDNS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XDNS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDNS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUUS.L vs. XDNS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUUS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDNS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SUUS.LXDNS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.39

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

3.81

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.20

11.43

+0.76

SUUS.L vs. XDNS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the XDNS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUUS.L and XDNS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SUUS.LXDNS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

2.09

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.68

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.60

+0.36

Drawdowns

SUUS.L vs. XDNS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUUS.L drawdown since its inception was -24.56%, roughly equal to the maximum XDNS.L drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUUS.L and XDNS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUUS.LXDNS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.56%

-24.75%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.22%

-10.70%

+3.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.62%

-14.32%

-7.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.62%

-19.29%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.57%

+0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.54%

-5.35%

+1.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

4.04%

-1.92%

Volatility

SUUS.L vs. XDNS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUUS.L) is 3.55%, while Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDNS.L) has a volatility of 3.89%. This indicates that SUUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDNS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUUS.LXDNS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.55%

3.89%

-0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.46%

14.64%

-6.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.52%

19.56%

-8.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.61%

17.83%

-3.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.69%

17.31%

-1.62%

SUUS.L vs. XDNS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUUS.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XDNS.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SUUS.L vs. XDNS.L - Dividend Comparison

SUUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XDNS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
SUUS.L
iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XDNS.L
Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D
1.43%1.63%1.65%1.81%2.83%1.46%1.79%1.77%1.20%1.97%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


SUUS.L and XDNS.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDNS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDNS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SUUS.L.

SUUS.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XDNS.L is Japan Equities. SUUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while XDNS.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: iShares and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SUUS.L and 0.15% for XDNS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUUS.L and XDNS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer