SUSW.L vs. XDWH.L
SUSW.L (iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and XDWH.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - SUSW.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while XDWH.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SUSW.L returned 10.52%/yr vs 5.52%/yr for XDWH.L. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SUSW.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWH.L.
Performance
SUSW.L vs. XDWH.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SUSW.L is traded in EUR, while XDWH.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XDWH.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SUSW.L achieves a 11.31% return, which is significantly higher than XDWH.L's -1.62% return.
SUSW.L
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 3.92%
- YTD
- 11.31%
- 6M
- 11.35%
- 1Y
- 18.73%
- 3Y*
- 12.95%
- 5Y*
- 10.52%
- 10Y*
- —
XDWH.L
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- 3.58%
- YTD
- -1.62%
- 6M
- -1.24%
- 1Y
- 10.16%
- 3Y*
- 2.70%
- 5Y*
- 5.52%
- 10Y*
- 7.62%
SUSW.L vs. XDWH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUSW.L iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 11.31% | 1.89% | 18.34% | 20.78% | -16.40% | 35.65% | 10.76% | 32.32% | -3.09% | 2.02% |
XDWH.L Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | -1.62% | 1.57% | 7.40% | 0.70% | 0.44% | 29.58% | 3.58% | 25.73% | 6.34% | -2.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between SUSW.L and XDWH.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2017 | 0.65 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SUSW.L and XDWH.L has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SUSW.L vs. XDWH.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SUSW.L
XDWH.L
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
-
Technology
SUSW.L
XDWH.L
-
Financial Services
SUSW.L
XDWH.L
-
Industrials
SUSW.L
XDWH.L
-
Healthcare
SUSW.L
XDWH.L
Consumer Cyclical
SUSW.L
XDWH.L
-
Communication Services
SUSW.L
XDWH.L
-
Consumer Defensive
SUSW.L
XDWH.L
Basic Materials
SUSW.L
XDWH.L
-
Real Estate
SUSW.L
XDWH.L
-
Utilities
SUSW.L
XDWH.L
-
Energy
SUSW.L
-
XDWH.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SUSW.L vs. XDWH.L — Risk / Return Rank
SUSW.L
XDWH.L
SUSW.L vs. XDWH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SUSW.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SUSW.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.13 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | 0.96 | +1.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.66 | 2.34 | +6.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SUSW.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 0.66 | +0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.39 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.53 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
SUSW.L vs. XDWH.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SUSW.L drawdown since its inception was -32.09%, which is greater than XDWH.L's maximum drawdown of -25.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSW.L and XDWH.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SUSW.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.09% | -25.61% | -6.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.80% | -10.11% | +2.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.13% | -21.19% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.13% | -21.19% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -8.34% | +8.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.93% | -4.83% | -0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 4.14% | -2.00% |
Volatility
SUSW.L vs. XDWH.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SUSW.L) is 3.49%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L) has a volatility of 5.04%. This indicates that SUSW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SUSW.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.49% | 5.04% | -1.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.12% | 10.56% | -1.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.26% | 14.62% | -2.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.61% | 14.08% | +0.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.23% | 15.35% | +0.88% |
SUSW.L vs. XDWH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SUSW.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWH.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SUSW.L vs. XDWH.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SUSW.L nor XDWH.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SUSW.L and XDWH.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SUSW.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SUSW.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWH.L.
SUSW.L is categorized as Global Equities, while XDWH.L is Health & Biotech Equities. SUSW.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while XDWH.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SUSW.L and 0.25% for XDWH.L.
Find the right allocation for SUSW.L and XDWH.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer