SUSD.L vs. SWRD.L
SUSD.L (SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF) and SWRD.L (SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SUSD.L is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD, while SWRD.L is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SUSD.L returned 4.04%/yr vs 13.18%/yr for SWRD.L. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.12% expense ratio.
Performance
SUSD.L vs. SWRD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SUSD.L is traded in GBP, while SWRD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SWRD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SUSD.L achieves a 1.34% return, which is significantly lower than SWRD.L's 10.32% return.
SUSD.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- YTD
- 1.34%
- 6M
- 0.80%
- 1Y
- 5.70%
- 3Y*
- 2.52%
- 5Y*
- 4.04%
- 10Y*
- 3.36%
SWRD.L
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 3.84%
- YTD
- 10.32%
- 6M
- 10.04%
- 1Y
- 27.16%
- 3Y*
- 17.88%
- 5Y*
- 13.18%
- 10Y*
- —
SUSD.L vs. SWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUSD.L SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 1.34% | -1.69% | 7.18% | -0.46% | 9.68% | 1.10% | -0.39% | 3.28% |
SWRD.L SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF | 10.29% | 12.46% | 21.34% | 18.20% | -8.04% | 23.27% | 12.48% | 13.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between SUSD.L and SWRD.L is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2019 | -0.01 |
SUSD.L vs. SWRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SUSD.L
SWRD.L
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
SUSD.L
SWRD.L
Healthcare
SUSD.L
SWRD.L
Consumer Cyclical
SUSD.L
SWRD.L
Technology
SUSD.L
SWRD.L
Industrials
SUSD.L
SWRD.L
Utilities
SUSD.L
SWRD.L
Consumer Defensive
SUSD.L
SWRD.L
Energy
SUSD.L
SWRD.L
Communication Services
SUSD.L
SWRD.L
Real Estate
SUSD.L
SWRD.L
Basic Materials
SUSD.L
SWRD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SUSD.L vs. SWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank
SUSD.L
SWRD.L
SUSD.L vs. SWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SUSD.L) and SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SUSD.L | SWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.44 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | 4.20 | -2.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.31 | 15.90 | -12.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SUSD.L | SWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 2.35 | -1.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.92 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.85 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
SUSD.L vs. SWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SUSD.L drawdown since its inception was -15.18%, smaller than the maximum SWRD.L drawdown of -26.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSD.L and SWRD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SUSD.L | SWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.18% | -26.90% | +11.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.27% | -6.47% | +2.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.03% | -18.71% | +9.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.18% | -18.71% | +3.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.84% | -0.14% | -3.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.84% | -3.22% | -2.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.63% | 1.71% | -0.08% |
Volatility
SUSD.L vs. SWRD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SUSD.L) is 1.75%, while SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L) has a volatility of 3.43%. This indicates that SUSD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWRD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SUSD.L | SWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.75% | 3.43% | -1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.50% | 8.79% | -4.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.19% | 11.57% | -5.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.17% | 14.37% | -6.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.23% | 16.41% | -7.18% |
SUSD.L vs. SWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SUSD.L and SWRD.L have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SUSD.L vs. SWRD.L - Dividend Comparison
SUSD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, while SWRD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUSD.L SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 4.60% | 4.91% | 4.20% | 3.11% | 1.14% | 1.80% | 2.77% | 2.57% | 1.66% | 1.74% | 1.28% | 1.00% |
SWRD.L SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SUSD.L and SWRD.L have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.12% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SUSD.L and SWRD.L have the same expense ratio: 0.12% per year.
SUSD.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while SWRD.L is Large Cap Growth Equities. SUSD.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD, while SWRD.L tracks MSCI World Index.
Find the right allocation for SUSD.L and SWRD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer