PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUSD.L vs. SHYU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SUSD.L vs. SHYU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SUSD.L) and iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SHYU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUSD.L achieves a 1.34% return, which is significantly higher than SHYU.L's -1.70% return. Over the past 10 years, SUSD.L has underperformed SHYU.L with an annualized return of 3.36%, while SHYU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 4.84% annualized return.


SUSD.L

1D
0.05%
1M
1.52%
YTD
1.34%
6M
0.80%
1Y
5.70%
3Y*
2.52%
5Y*
4.04%
10Y*
3.36%

SHYU.L

1D
0.16%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
-1.70%
6M
-2.17%
1Y
1.89%
3Y*
2.26%
5Y*
3.17%
10Y*
4.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUSD.L vs. SHYU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SUSD.L
SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
1.34%-1.69%7.18%-0.46%9.68%1.10%-0.39%1.34%7.32%-7.71%
SHYU.L
iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF
-1.70%-4.17%8.56%4.72%2.04%4.96%1.60%9.12%4.39%-3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between SUSD.L and SHYU.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2013

0.74

The correlation between SUSD.L and SHYU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (5 years) to 0.85 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUSD.L vs. SHYU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUSD.L
SUSD.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
SUSD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUSD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUSD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
SUSD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUSD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

SHYU.L
SHYU.L Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
SHYU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHYU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHYU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
SHYU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHYU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUSD.L vs. SHYU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SUSD.L) and iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SHYU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SUSD.LSHYU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.05

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

0.25

+1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.31

0.43

+2.88

SUSD.L vs. SHYU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUSD.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is higher than the SHYU.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUSD.L and SHYU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SUSD.LSHYU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

0.24

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.39

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.50

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.59

-0.19

Drawdowns

SUSD.L vs. SHYU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUSD.L drawdown since its inception was -15.18%, roughly equal to the maximum SHYU.L drawdown of -15.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSD.L and SHYU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUSD.LSHYU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.18%

-15.01%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.27%

-6.61%

+2.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.03%

-11.08%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.18%

-11.08%

-4.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.18%

-15.01%

-0.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.84%

-9.14%

+5.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.84%

-4.14%

-1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

3.83%

-2.20%

Volatility

SUSD.L vs. SHYU.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SUSD.L) and iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SHYU.L) have volatilities of 1.75% and 1.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUSD.LSHYU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.75%

1.72%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.50%

4.34%

+0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.19%

6.89%

-0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.17%

8.13%

+0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.23%

9.74%

-0.51%

SUSD.L vs. SHYU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUSD.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than SHYU.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SUSD.L vs. SHYU.L - Dividend Comparison

SUSD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, while SHYU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SHYU.L
iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%6.32%5.76%4.82%4.27%5.16%5.58%5.52%5.74%5.16%5.87%
SUSD.L
SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
4.60%4.91%4.20%3.11%1.14%1.80%2.77%2.57%1.66%1.74%1.28%1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SUSD.L and SHYU.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SUSD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SUSD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SHYU.L.

SUSD.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD, while SHYU.L tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SUSD.L and 0.50% for SHYU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUSD.L and SHYU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer