SUSA vs. VTV
SUSA (iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SUSA is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA ESG Select Index, while VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SUSA returned 15.03%/yr vs 12.49%/yr for VTV. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SUSA charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.
Performance
SUSA vs. VTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SUSA achieves a 11.51% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 13.16% return. Over the past 10 years, SUSA has outperformed VTV with an annualized return of 15.03%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively lower 12.49% annualized return.
SUSA
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 5.24%
- YTD
- 11.51%
- 6M
- 11.01%
- 1Y
- 26.81%
- 3Y*
- 21.19%
- 5Y*
- 11.94%
- 10Y*
- 15.03%
VTV
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 4.08%
- YTD
- 13.16%
- 6M
- 14.00%
- 1Y
- 27.88%
- 3Y*
- 18.69%
- 5Y*
- 11.41%
- 10Y*
- 12.49%
SUSA vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUSA iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF | 11.51% | 15.72% | 22.43% | 23.88% | -21.38% | 30.45% | 24.66% | 32.10% | -5.67% | 22.52% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 13.16% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -2.09% | 26.53% | 2.33% | 25.66% | -5.47% | 17.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between SUSA and VTV is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2005 | 0.88 |
The correlation between SUSA and VTV shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SUSA vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SUSA
VTV
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
SUSA
VTV
Financial Services
SUSA
VTV
Industrials
SUSA
VTV
Healthcare
SUSA
VTV
Communication Services
SUSA
VTV
Consumer Cyclical
SUSA
VTV
Energy
SUSA
VTV
Consumer Defensive
SUSA
VTV
Real Estate
SUSA
VTV
Basic Materials
SUSA
VTV
Utilities
SUSA
VTV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SUSA vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank
SUSA
VTV
SUSA vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF (SUSA) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SUSA | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.50 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | 4.41 | -1.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.27 | 16.67 | -4.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SUSA | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.18 | 2.77 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.83 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | 0.75 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.51 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
SUSA vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SUSA drawdown since its inception was -53.93%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSA and VTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SUSA | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.93% | -59.27% | +5.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.71% | -6.35% | -3.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.30% | -14.52% | -4.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.23% | -17.04% | -11.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.93% | -36.78% | +3.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.52% | 0.00% | -0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.24% | -7.87% | +0.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 1.68% | +0.51% |
Volatility
SUSA vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF (SUSA) has a higher volatility of 3.17% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.48%. This indicates that SUSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SUSA | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.17% | 2.48% | +0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.58% | 7.57% | +2.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.36% | 10.12% | +2.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 13.88% | +3.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.15% | 16.66% | +1.49% |
SUSA vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SUSA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SUSA vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison
SUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than VTV's 1.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUSA iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF | 0.82% | 0.89% | 1.15% | 1.32% | 1.52% | 0.98% | 1.17% | 1.52% | 1.72% | 1.40% | 1.56% | 1.42% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.85% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SUSA and VTV have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SUSA has higher volatility (3.17%) compared to VTV (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUSA dropped -53.93% vs VTV's -59.27%.
On 10-year performance, SUSA leads with 15.03% vs 12.49% for VTV. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SUSA has performed better with a 15.03% return vs 12.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SUSA.
VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 0.82% for SUSA.
SUSA is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. SUSA tracks MSCI USA ESG Select Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SUSA and 0.04% for VTV.
VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SUSA and VTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer