PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUSA vs. VTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SUSA vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF (SUSA) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUSA achieves a 11.51% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 13.16% return. Over the past 10 years, SUSA has outperformed VTV with an annualized return of 15.03%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively lower 12.49% annualized return.


SUSA

1D
0.36%
1M
5.24%
YTD
11.51%
6M
11.01%
1Y
26.81%
3Y*
21.19%
5Y*
11.94%
10Y*
15.03%

VTV

1D
0.77%
1M
4.08%
YTD
13.16%
6M
14.00%
1Y
27.88%
3Y*
18.69%
5Y*
11.41%
10Y*
12.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUSA vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SUSA
iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF
11.51%15.72%22.43%23.88%-21.38%30.45%24.66%32.10%-5.67%22.52%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
13.16%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.47%17.15%

Correlation

The correlation between SUSA and VTV is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2005

0.88

The correlation between SUSA and VTV shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SUSA vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SUSA
VTV

Technology

39.4%
13.4%

Financial Services

11.9%
22.3%

Industrials

10.2%
14.0%

Healthcare

9.0%
14.5%

Communication Services

8.5%
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
4.0%

Energy

3.9%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
9.4%

Real Estate

3.1%
2.8%

Basic Materials

2.5%
3.1%

Utilities

1.3%
5.2%

Technology

SUSA
39.4%
VTV
13.4%

Financial Services

SUSA
11.9%
VTV
22.3%

Industrials

SUSA
10.2%
VTV
14.0%

Healthcare

SUSA
9.0%
VTV
14.5%

Communication Services

SUSA
8.5%
VTV
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SUSA
6.9%
VTV
4.0%

Energy

SUSA
3.9%
VTV
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

SUSA
3.5%
VTV
9.4%

Real Estate

SUSA
3.1%
VTV
2.8%

Basic Materials

SUSA
2.5%
VTV
3.1%

Utilities

SUSA
1.3%
VTV
5.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUSA vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUSA
SUSA Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUSA vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF (SUSA) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SUSAVTVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.50

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

4.41

-1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.27

16.67

-4.40

SUSA vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUSA Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUSA and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SUSAVTVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

2.77

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.83

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.75

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.51

+0.06

Drawdowns

SUSA vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUSA drawdown since its inception was -53.93%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSA and VTV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUSAVTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.93%

-59.27%

+5.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.71%

-6.35%

-3.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.30%

-14.52%

-4.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.23%

-17.04%

-11.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.93%

-36.78%

+3.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

0.00%

-0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.24%

-7.87%

+0.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

1.68%

+0.51%

Volatility

SUSA vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF (SUSA) has a higher volatility of 3.17% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.48%. This indicates that SUSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUSAVTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.17%

2.48%

+0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.58%

7.57%

+2.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.36%

10.12%

+2.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.33%

13.88%

+3.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.15%

16.66%

+1.49%

SUSA vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUSA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SUSA vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

SUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than VTV's 1.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SUSA
iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF
0.82%0.89%1.15%1.32%1.52%0.98%1.17%1.52%1.72%1.40%1.56%1.42%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.85%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


SUSA and VTV have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SUSA has higher volatility (3.17%) compared to VTV (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUSA dropped -53.93% vs VTV's -59.27%.

On 10-year performance, SUSA leads with 15.03% vs 12.49% for VTV. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SUSA has performed better with a 15.03% return vs 12.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SUSA.

VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 0.82% for SUSA.

SUSA is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. SUSA tracks MSCI USA ESG Select Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SUSA and 0.04% for VTV.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUSA and VTV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer