SUSA vs. CSHP
SUSA (iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SUSA is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA ESG Select Index, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. SUSA is passively managed, while CSHP is actively managed. Over the past year, SUSA returned 23.70% vs 3.94% for CSHP. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SUSA charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.
Performance
SUSA vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SUSA achieves a 8.78% return, which is significantly higher than CSHP's 1.83% return.
SUSA
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- 8.78%
- 6M
- 7.70%
- 1Y
- 23.70%
- 3Y*
- 19.61%
- 5Y*
- 11.15%
- 10Y*
- 15.14%
CSHP
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 3.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SUSA vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SUSA iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF | 8.78% | 15.72% | 5.90% |
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 1.83% | 4.10% | 2.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between SUSA and CSHP is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2024 | 0.01 |
The correlation between SUSA and CSHP shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SUSA vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank
SUSA
CSHP
SUSA vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF (SUSA) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SUSA | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -9.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -25.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 6.46 | -5.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 65.45 | -63.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.52 | 381.67 | -371.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SUSA vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SUSA drawdown since its inception was -53.93%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSA and CSHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SUSA | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.93% | -0.08% | -53.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.71% | -0.06% | -9.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.96% | -0.04% | -2.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.23% | -0.00% | -7.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | 0.01% | +2.25% |
Volatility
SUSA vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF (SUSA) has a higher volatility of 5.05% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.16%. This indicates that SUSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SUSA | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.05% | 0.16% | +4.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.42% | 0.27% | +10.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.98% | 0.36% | +12.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.43% | 0.41% | +17.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.17% | 0.41% | +17.76% |
SUSA vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SUSA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SUSA vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison
SUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than CSHP's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 3.91% | 5.39% | 1.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SUSA iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF | 0.86% | 0.89% | 1.15% | 1.32% | 1.52% | 0.98% | 1.17% | 1.52% | 1.72% | 1.40% | 1.56% | 1.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SUSA and CSHP have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SUSA has higher volatility (5.05%) compared to CSHP (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUSA dropped -53.93% vs CSHP's -0.08%.
On 1-year performance, SUSA leads with 23.70% vs 3.94% for CSHP. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SUSA has performed better with a 23.70% return vs 3.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SUSA.
CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 0.86% for SUSA.
SUSA is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SUSA and 0.20% for CSHP.
CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.09 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SUSA and CSHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer