PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SURYY vs. CLILF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SURYY vs. CLILF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sumitomo Realty & Development Co. Ltd (SURYY) and CapitaLand Investment Limited (CLILF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SURYY achieves a -4.62% return, which is significantly lower than CLILF's 6.49% return.


SURYY

1D
4.75%
1M
-21.08%
YTD
-4.62%
6M
-46.38%
1Y
-28.08%
3Y*
1.53%
5Y*
10Y*

CLILF

1D
-5.59%
1M
-12.44%
YTD
6.49%
6M
33.67%
1Y
15.00%
3Y*
-6.02%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SURYY vs. CLILF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SURYY
Sumitomo Realty & Development Co. Ltd
-4.62%-24.29%44.95%-0.60%1.21%
CLILF
CapitaLand Investment Limited
6.49%-3.06%-1.09%-23.92%8.70%

Correlation

The correlation between SURYY and CLILF is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2022

0.03

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SURYY:

$22.61B

CLILF:

$7.72B

EPS

SURYY:

$115.63

CLILF:

$0.05

PE Ratio

SURYY:

0.11

CLILF:

40.59

PS Ratio

SURYY:

0.02

CLILF:

3.06

PB Ratio

SURYY:

0.01

CLILF:

0.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

SURYY:

$1.07T

CLILF:

$2.91B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SURYY:

$349.64B

CLILF:

$2.22B

EBITDA (TTM)

SURYY:

$379.18B

CLILF:

$153.89M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SURYY vs. CLILF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SURYY
SURYY Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
SURYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SURYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
SURYY Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
SURYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SURYY Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

CLILF
CLILF Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
CLILF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLILF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLILF Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
CLILF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLILF Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SURYY vs. CLILF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sumitomo Realty & Development Co. Ltd (SURYY) and CapitaLand Investment Limited (CLILF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SURYYCLILFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.36

0.24

-0.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.07

0.90

-0.82

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.26

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.50

0.52

-1.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.93

1.07

-2.00

SURYY vs. CLILF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SURYY Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is lower than the CLILF Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SURYY and CLILF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SURYYCLILFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.36

0.24

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

-0.06

+0.08

Drawdowns

SURYY vs. CLILF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SURYY drawdown since its inception was -56.38%, smaller than the maximum CLILF drawdown of -66.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SURYY and CLILF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SURYYCLILFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.38%

-66.07%

+9.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.38%

-29.26%

-27.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.38%

-45.96%

-10.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.59%

-53.74%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.59%

-44.05%

+24.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.35%

14.09%

+16.26%

Volatility

SURYY vs. CLILF - Volatility Comparison

Sumitomo Realty & Development Co. Ltd (SURYY) has a higher volatility of 28.03% compared to CapitaLand Investment Limited (CLILF) at 10.69%. This indicates that SURYY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLILF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SURYYCLILFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.03%

10.69%

+17.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

87.16%

54.59%

+32.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

79.00%

62.76%

+16.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.15%

80.17%

-18.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.15%

80.17%

-18.02%

Dividends

SURYY vs. CLILF - Dividend Comparison

SURYY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CLILF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%.


Financials

SURYY vs. CLILF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sumitomo Realty & Development Co. Ltd and CapitaLand Investment Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B250.00B300.00B350.00B20222023202420252026
283.74B
1.15B
(SURYY) Total Revenue
(CLILF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SURYY vs. CLILF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sumitomo Realty & Development Co. Ltd and CapitaLand Investment Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
23.2%
39.6%
Portfolio components
SURYY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sumitomo Realty & Development Co. Ltd reported a gross profit of 65.77B and revenue of 283.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.2%.

CLILF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CapitaLand Investment Limited reported a gross profit of 453.66M and revenue of 1.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.6%.

SURYY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sumitomo Realty & Development Co. Ltd reported an operating income of 62.29B and revenue of 283.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.0%.

CLILF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CapitaLand Investment Limited reported an operating income of 325.76M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.4%.

SURYY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sumitomo Realty & Development Co. Ltd reported a net income of 38.35B and revenue of 283.74B, resulting in a net margin of 13.5%.

CLILF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CapitaLand Investment Limited reported a net income of -141.89M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in a net margin of -12.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SURYY and CLILF have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SURYY has higher volatility (28.03%) compared to CLILF (10.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SURYY dropped -56.38% vs CLILF's -66.07%.

CLILF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.24 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SURYY and CLILF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer