SURE vs. LVDS

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

SURE (AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF) and LVDS (JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SURE returned 28.62% vs 29.17% for LVDS. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SURE charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for LVDS.

Performance

SURE vs. LVDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF (SURE) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SURE achieves a 17.28% return, which is significantly lower than LVDS's 19.24% return.

SURE

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: 2.98%
• 6M: 12.39%
• YTD: 17.28%
• 1Y: 28.62%
• 3Y*: 16.51%
• 5Y*: 11.12%
• 10Y*: 11.24%

LVDS

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: 2.52%
• 6M: 15.52%
• YTD: 19.24%
• 1Y: 29.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SURE vs. LVDS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SURE AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF	17.28%	7.89%
LVDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF	19.24%	7.40%

Correlation

The correlation between SURE and LVDS is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025	0.80

The correlation between SURE and LVDS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

SURE vs. LVDS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SURE	LVDS
Technology	24.6%	18.7%
Consumer Cyclical	19.3%	8.4%
Financial Services	15.3%	18.7%
Industrials	13.4%	12.1%
Communication Services	9.5%	7.5%
Energy	5.8%	6.6%
Healthcare	5.5%	10.1%
Basic Materials	2.0%	2.7%
Consumer Defensive	0.9%	6.4%
Utilities	0.9%	4.7%
Real Estate	0.8%	4.1%

Return for Risk

SURE vs. LVDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SURE

SURE Risk / Return Rank: 86
SURE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
SURE Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
SURE Omega Ratio Rank: 80
SURE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
SURE Martin Ratio Rank: 88

LVDS

LVDS Risk / Return Rank: 93
LVDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
LVDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
LVDS Omega Ratio Rank: 92
LVDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
LVDS Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SURE vs. LVDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF (SURE) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SURE	LVDS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.18	2.79	-0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.18	3.94	-0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.50	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.05	4.41	-0.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.08	17.88	-2.80

SURE vs. LVDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SURE Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the LVDS Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SURE and LVDS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SURE vs. LVDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SURE drawdown since its inception was -35.68%, which is greater than LVDS's maximum drawdown of -6.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SURE and LVDS.

Drawdown Indicators

	SURE	LVDS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.68%	-6.64%	-29.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.10%	-6.64%	-0.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.54%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.75%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.81%	-0.92%	-3.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.90%	1.64%	+0.26%

Volatility

SURE vs. LVDS - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF (SURE) has a higher volatility of 3.20% compared to JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS) at 2.88%. This indicates that SURE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SURE	LVDS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.20%	2.88%	+0.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.62%	8.16%	+1.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.16%	10.50%	+2.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.11%	10.56%	+6.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.49%	10.56%	+6.93%

SURE vs. LVDS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SURE has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than LVDS's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

SURE vs. LVDS - Dividend Comparison

SURE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than LVDS's 7.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LVDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF	7.55%	8.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SURE AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF	0.86%	1.01%	0.68%	1.11%	1.72%	1.08%	1.28%	1.09%	1.26%	0.65%	1.14%	0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SURE and LVDS in my portfolio?

SURE and LVDS have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SURE or LVDS?

SURE has higher volatility (3.20%) compared to LVDS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SURE dropped -35.68% vs LVDS's -6.64%.

Which ETF is better, SURE or LVDS?

On 1-year performance, LVDS leads with 29.17% vs 28.62% for SURE. On fees, LVDS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, LVDS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SURE or LVDS?

Over the 1-year period, LVDS has performed better with a 29.17% return vs 28.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SURE or LVDS?

LVDS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SURE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SURE or LVDS?

LVDS has the higher dividend yield at 7.55%, compared with 0.86% for SURE.

What is the main difference between SURE and LVDS?

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for SURE and 0.30% for LVDS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LVDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.