PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUPP vs. TEXN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SUPP vs. TEXN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF (SUPP) and iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUPP achieves a 17.60% return, which is significantly lower than TEXN's 20.04% return.


SUPP

1D
-2.27%
1M
-2.32%
6M
12.78%
YTD
17.60%
1Y
20.26%
3Y*
15.79%
5Y*
10Y*

TEXN

1D
-0.18%
1M
-1.85%
6M
15.73%
YTD
20.04%
1Y
27.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUPP vs. TEXN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SUPP
TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF
17.60%7.64%
TEXN
iShares Texas Equity ETF
20.04%8.33%

Correlation

The correlation between SUPP and TEXN is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

0.57

The correlation between SUPP and TEXN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

SUPP vs. TEXN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SUPP
TEXN

Industrials

52.4%
16.3%

Technology

37.0%
20.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.2%
11.6%

Basic Materials

4.4%
0.7%

Communication Services

-

3.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.1%

Energy

-

32.3%

Financial Services

-

3.9%

Healthcare

-

2.7%

Real Estate

-

3.9%

Utilities

-

2.7%

Industrials

SUPP
52.4%
TEXN
16.3%

Technology

SUPP
37.0%
TEXN
20.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SUPP
6.2%
TEXN
11.6%

Basic Materials

SUPP
4.4%
TEXN
0.7%

Communication Services

SUPP

-

TEXN
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

SUPP

-

TEXN
2.1%

Energy

SUPP

-

TEXN
32.3%

Financial Services

SUPP

-

TEXN
3.9%

Healthcare

SUPP

-

TEXN
2.7%

Real Estate

SUPP

-

TEXN
3.9%

Utilities

SUPP

-

TEXN
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUPP vs. TEXN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUPP
SUPP Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
SUPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUPP Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SUPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUPP Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

TEXN
TEXN Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
TEXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEXN Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
TEXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEXN Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUPP vs. TEXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF (SUPP) and iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SUPPTEXNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.33

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

4.20

-2.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.81

12.70

-6.90

SUPP vs. TEXN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUPP Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the TEXN Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUPP and TEXN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SUPP vs. TEXN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUPP drawdown since its inception was -25.03%, which is greater than TEXN's maximum drawdown of -6.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUPP and TEXN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUPPTEXNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.03%

-6.48%

-18.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.59%

-6.48%

-7.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.30%

-4.90%

-2.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.36%

-1.44%

-2.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

2.14%

+1.36%

Volatility

SUPP vs. TEXN - Volatility Comparison

TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF (SUPP) has a higher volatility of 10.11% compared to iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN) at 3.97%. This indicates that SUPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TEXN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUPPTEXNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.11%

3.97%

+6.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.30%

10.17%

+9.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.09%

14.54%

+7.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.09%

14.48%

+5.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.09%

14.48%

+5.61%

SUPP vs. TEXN - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUPP has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TEXN's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

SUPP vs. TEXN - Dividend Comparison

SUPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than TEXN's 1.40% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
SUPP
TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF
0.30%0.35%0.49%0.45%
TEXN
iShares Texas Equity ETF
1.40%0.86%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SUPP and TEXN have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SUPP has higher volatility (10.11%) compared to TEXN (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUPP dropped -25.03% vs TEXN's -6.48%.

On 1-year performance, TEXN leads with 27.14% vs 20.26% for SUPP. On fees, TEXN is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, TEXN has been the lower-risk option at 3.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TEXN has performed better with a 27.14% return vs 20.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TEXN is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SUPP.

TEXN has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 0.30% for SUPP.

They also come from different issuers: TCW and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SUPP and 0.20% for TEXN.

TEXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUPP and TEXN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer