SUPL vs. TQQQ
SUPL (ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - SUPL is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the FactSet Supply Chain Logistics Index - Benchmark TR Net, while TQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SUPL returned 11.82%/yr vs 69.92%/yr for TQQQ. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SUPL charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TQQQ.
Performance
SUPL vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SUPL achieves a 18.43% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 65.71% return.
SUPL
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 3.30%
- YTD
- 18.43%
- 6M
- 21.89%
- 1Y
- 28.98%
- 3Y*
- 11.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TQQQ
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 33.57%
- YTD
- 65.71%
- 6M
- 58.23%
- 1Y
- 145.30%
- 3Y*
- 69.92%
- 5Y*
- 29.86%
- 10Y*
- 45.44%
SUPL vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUPL ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF | 18.43% | 9.25% | -2.44% | 23.69% | -13.32% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 65.71% | 34.35% | 58.27% | 198.04% | -67.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between SUPL and TQQQ is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2022 | 0.61 |
The correlation between SUPL and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SUPL vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SUPL
TQQQ
Industrials
Energy
Healthcare
Utilities
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
SUPL
TQQQ
Energy
SUPL
TQQQ
Healthcare
SUPL
TQQQ
Utilities
SUPL
TQQQ
Technology
SUPL
TQQQ
Basic Materials
SUPL
-
TQQQ
Communication Services
SUPL
-
TQQQ
Consumer Cyclical
SUPL
-
TQQQ
Consumer Defensive
SUPL
-
TQQQ
Financial Services
SUPL
-
TQQQ
Real Estate
SUPL
-
TQQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SUPL vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
SUPL
TQQQ
SUPL vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF (SUPL) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SUPL | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.81 | 3.07 | -1.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.48 | 3.19 | -0.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.42 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 4.08 | -1.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.56 | 13.38 | -3.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SUPL | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | 3.07 | -1.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.74 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
SUPL vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SUPL drawdown since its inception was -24.42%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUPL and TQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SUPL | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.42% | -81.66% | +57.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.76% | -36.97% | +27.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.71% | -58.04% | +36.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -81.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -81.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.97% | -18.53% | +12.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 11.28% | -8.21% |
Volatility
SUPL vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF (SUPL) is 6.12%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 13.26%. This indicates that SUPL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SUPL | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.12% | 13.26% | -7.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.81% | 36.05% | -23.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.09% | 47.63% | -31.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 66.55% | -47.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 65.98% | -47.04% |
SUPL vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SUPL has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SUPL vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
SUPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, more than TQQQ's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUPL ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF | 2.65% | 3.03% | 4.78% | 4.71% | 3.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.36% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SUPL and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TQQQ has higher volatility (13.26%) compared to SUPL (6.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUPL dropped -24.42% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.
On 3-year performance, TQQQ leads with 69.92% vs 11.82% for SUPL. On fees, SUPL is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, SUPL has been the lower-risk option at 6.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 69.92% return vs 11.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SUPL is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.
SUPL has the higher dividend yield at 2.65%, compared with 0.36% for TQQQ.
SUPL is categorized as Industrials Equities, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. SUPL tracks FactSet Supply Chain Logistics Index - Benchmark TR Net, while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 0.58% for SUPL and 0.95% for TQQQ.
TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SUPL and TQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer