SUPL vs. TOLZ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SUPL (ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF) and TOLZ (ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds from ProShares - SUPL tracks the FactSet Supply Chain Logistics Index - Benchmark TR Net while TOLZ tracks the Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SUPL returned 10.39%/yr vs 15.12%/yr for TOLZ. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SUPL charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for TOLZ.

Performance

SUPL vs. TOLZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF (SUPL) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUPL achieves a 13.92% return, which is significantly higher than TOLZ's 12.09% return.

SUPL

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: -0.06%
• YTD: 13.92%
• 6M: 13.11%
• 1Y: 23.18%
• 3Y*: 10.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TOLZ

• 1D: 0.88%
• 1M: -2.33%
• YTD: 12.09%
• 6M: 12.14%
• 1Y: 16.35%
• 3Y*: 15.12%
• 5Y*: 8.72%
• 10Y*: 7.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUPL vs. TOLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SUPL ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF	13.92%	9.25%	-2.44%	23.69%	-11.01%
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF	12.09%	14.76%	11.67%	6.18%	-9.66%

Correlation

The correlation between SUPL and TOLZ is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2022	0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between SUPL and TOLZ has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SUPL vs. TOLZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SUPL	TOLZ
Industrials	60.0%	5.1%
Energy	4.5%	36.0%
Healthcare	3.2%	-
Utilities	3.2%	22.2%
Technology	1.3%	0.4%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.4%
Financial Services	-	1.9%
Real Estate	-	7.9%

Return for Risk

SUPL vs. TOLZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUPL

SUPL Risk / Return Rank: 45
SUPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
SUPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
SUPL Omega Ratio Rank: 41
SUPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
SUPL Martin Ratio Rank: 48

TOLZ

TOLZ Risk / Return Rank: 53
TOLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
TOLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
TOLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 44
TOLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
TOLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUPL vs. TOLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF (SUPL) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SUPL	TOLZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	1.58	-0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.96	2.27	-0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.27	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.39	3.17	-0.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.41	9.16	-1.75

SUPL vs. TOLZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUPL Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the TOLZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUPL and TOLZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SUPL vs. TOLZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUPL drawdown since its inception was -24.42%, smaller than the maximum TOLZ drawdown of -39.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUPL and TOLZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SUPL	TOLZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.42%	-39.33%	+14.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.76%	-5.18%	-4.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.71%	-11.94%	-9.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.85%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.73%	-2.45%	-3.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.91%	-6.61%	+0.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.14%	1.79%	+1.35%

Volatility

SUPL vs. TOLZ - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF (SUPL) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) at 3.24%. This indicates that SUPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TOLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SUPL	TOLZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.62%	3.24%	+2.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.49%	8.30%	+5.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.59%	10.41%	+6.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.00%	13.98%	+5.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.00%	16.23%	+2.77%

SUPL vs. TOLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUPL has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than TOLZ's 0.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

SUPL vs. TOLZ - Dividend Comparison

SUPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, less than TOLZ's 3.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SUPL ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF	2.75%	3.03%	4.78%	4.71%	3.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF	3.63%	3.99%	3.53%	3.34%	3.01%	3.28%	3.16%	2.96%	3.63%	3.30%	2.62%	3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SUPL and TOLZ in my portfolio?

SUPL and TOLZ have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SUPL or TOLZ?

SUPL has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to TOLZ (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUPL dropped -24.42% vs TOLZ's -39.33%.

Which ETF is better, SUPL or TOLZ?

On 3-year performance, TOLZ leads with 15.12% vs 10.39% for SUPL. On fees, TOLZ is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, TOLZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SUPL or TOLZ?

Over the 3-year period, TOLZ has performed better with a 15.12% return vs 10.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SUPL or TOLZ?

TOLZ is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for SUPL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SUPL or TOLZ?

TOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 2.75% for SUPL.

What is the main difference between SUPL and TOLZ?

SUPL tracks FactSet Supply Chain Logistics Index - Benchmark TR Net, while TOLZ tracks Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for SUPL and 0.46% for TOLZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TOLZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.