SULR vs. TOT
SULR (SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF) and TOT (LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. SULR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for TOT.
Performance
SULR vs. TOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SULR
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TOT
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 2.36%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SULR vs. TOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SULR SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF | 0.00% |
TOT LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF | 0.86% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SULR vs. TOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF (SULR) and LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF (TOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SULR vs. TOT - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SULR | TOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -4.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.62% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -1.45% | — |
Volatility
SULR vs. TOT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SULR | TOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 14.24% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 14.24% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 14.24% | — |
SULR vs. TOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SULR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than TOT's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
SULR vs. TOT - Dividend Comparison
Neither SULR nor TOT has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SULR SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF | 0.00% | 0.46% | 0.28% | 2.62% |
TOT LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, TOT is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TOT is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for SULR.
SULR and TOT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Guinness Atkinson and LionShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for SULR and 0.07% for TOT.
Find the right allocation for SULR and TOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer